/Users/andrea/_magisterarbeit/korpus/clean/trainkorpus/9/file2.html NN ----------------------------------------- : HELP VV E NN mail NN Author NN Author NN Archive NP Send VVP to TO a DT Friend NP Print NP Version NP November NP 16 CD , , 2005 CD , , 8 CD . SENT 31 CD a DT . SENT m NN . SENT Snatching VVG Defeat NN from IN the DT Jaws NN of IN Victory NP The NP Senate NP reverses VVZ itself PP and CC opens VVZ the DT courts NNS to TO al NP Qaeda NP . SENT I PP wrote VVD Monday NP that IN late JJ last JJ week NN , , the DT Senate NP after IN a DT year NN and CC a DT half NN of IN fiddling VVG while IN Rome NP burned VVD had VHD finally RB acted VVN to TO bar VV al NP Qaeda NP terrorists NNS detained VVD in IN Guantanamo NP Bay NP , , Cuba NP , , from IN using VVG the DT courts NNS of IN the DT American JJ people NNS as IN a DT weapon NN in IN their PP$ war NN against IN the DT American JJ people NNS . SENT Well RB , , when WRB it PP comes VVZ to TO the DT Republican JJ controlled JJ Senate NP , , such JJ lauding VVG is VBZ always RB done VVN at IN one CD s PP peril NN . SENT The DT ink NN was VBD not RB yet RB dry JJ or CC the DT online JJ equivalent NN on IN that DT article NN when WRB our PP$ distinguished JJ senior JJ legislators NNS struck VVD another DT of IN their PP$ craven JJ compromises NNS . SENT Last JJ week NN s VVZ 49 CD 42 CD margin NN demonstrated VVN that IN the DT votes NNS were VBD there RB to TO win VV . SENT Nevertheless RB , , the DT chamber NN has VHZ now RB reversed VVN itself PP . SENT By IN a DT vote NN of IN 84 CD 14 CD , , the DT senators NNS resolved VVN Tuesday NP that IN the DT ultimate JJ decision NN about IN who WP is VBZ properly RB considered VVN an DT enemy NN combatant NN , , should MD rest VV with IN federal JJ judges NNS , , not RB our PP$ military JJ commanders NNS who WP actually RB confront VVP the DT enemy NN in IN the DT life NN and CC death NN of IN the DT battlefield NN . SENT Snatching VVG defeat NN from IN the DT jaws NNS of IN victory NN , , Senator NP Lindsey NP Graham NP chose VVD to TO make VV common JJ cause NN with IN Senate NP Democrats NPS , , led VVN by IN Senator NP Carl NP Levin NP , , who WP favor VVP treating VVG the DT people NNS trying VVG to TO annihilate VV us PP as IN if IN they PP were VBD ordinary JJ criminal JJ defendants NNS . SENT Yes UH , , the DT military JJ commissions NNS favored VVN by IN the DT administration NN will MD go VV forward RB at IN least JJS for IN now RB . SENT But CC the DT compromise NN would MD allow VV any DT prisoner NN who WP received VVD a DT sentence NN of IN ten CD years NNS or CC more JJR of IN imprisonment NN including VVG death NN automatically RB to TO appeal VV to TO the DT U NP . SENT S NP . SENT Court NP of IN Appeals NPS in IN Washington NP . SENT The DT civilian JJ courts NNS will MD have VH the DT final JJ say NN . SENT The DT ten CD year NN threshold NN , , by IN the DT way NN , , is VBZ as RB slippery JJ as IN the DT rest NN of IN the DT compromise NN . SENT Leaving VVG aside RP that IN any DT real JJ terrorist NN is VBZ plainly RB going VVG to TO get VV more JJR than IN a DT ten CD year NN sentence NN , , the DT deal NN provides VVZ that IN even JJ detainees NNS who WP do VVP not RB qualify VV for IN the DT automatic JJ review NN would MD still RB be VB able JJ to TO seek VV discretionary JJ review NN i NP . SENT e SYM . SENT , , it PP will MD be VB up RB to TO federal JJ judges NNS , , unilaterally RB , , to TO decide VV whether IN to TO disturb VV the DT military JJ ruling NN . SENT The DT Senate NP has VHZ deigned VVN not RB to TO scuttle VV the DT commissions NNS outright RB and CC demand VV full JJ blown VVN civilian JJ trials NNS with IN all PDT their PP$ attendant NN , , defendant NN friendly JJ , , constitutional JJ protections NNS . SENT Consequently RB , , despite IN the DT reversal NN , , the DT Graham NP Levin NP deal NN is VBZ still RB being VBG spun VVN especially RB by IN Graham NP as IN a DT victory NN for IN the DT administration NN and CC for IN the DT separation NN of IN powers NNS tradition NN that IN dealing VVG with IN enemy NN forces NNS in IN wartime NN is VBZ an DT executive JJ branch NN function NN . SENT But CC don VV t NN be VB fooled VVN by IN the DT spin NN . SENT It PP s PP laughable JJ . SENT Everything NN that WDT happens VVZ in IN the DT commissions NNS would MD be VB reviewed VVN by IN the DT judges NNS if IN this DT measure NN passes VVZ . SENT And CC if IN the DT commissions NNS don VV t NN sufficiently RB emulate VV civilian JJ courts NNS , , how WRB should MD we PP suppose VVP that DT review NN will MD go VV . SENT FROM IN WAR NN FIGHTERS NNS TO TO GUMSHOES NNS Sixty CD years NNS ago RB , , the DT Supreme NP Court NP acknowledged VVD in IN no DT uncertain JJ terms NNS that IN war NN fighting NN and CC its PP$ component NN function NN of IN handling VVG enemy NN captives NNS is VBZ beyond IN the DT competence NN of IN the DT judiciary NN . SENT The DT trial NN and CC punishment NN of IN enemy NN combatants NNS , , ruled VVD the DT Court NP in IN United NP States NPS v NN . SENT Yamashita NP 1946 CD , , is VBZ an DT essential JJ part NN of IN the DT conduct NN of IN war NN a DT task NN committed VVN by IN the DT Constitution NP to TO the DT president NN . SENT No DT more JJR . SENT Not RB if IN the DT compromise NN becomes VVZ law NN . SENT As IN Sen NP . SENT Graham NP anticipates VVZ , , each DT detainee NN would MD be VB permitted VVN to TO challenge VV , , in IN federal JJ appellate JJ court NN , , whether IN he PP was VBD properly RB determined VVN to TO be VB an DT enemy NN combatant NN . SENT Why WRB a DT lawyer NN in IN a DT robe NN should MD be VB a DT better JJR judge NN of IN that DT than IN a DT military JJ professional NN , , we PP are VBP not RB told VVN . SENT Just RB imagine VV for IN a DT moment NN if IN the DT Senate NP decided VVD that IN judicial JJ decisions NNS on IN , , say VV , , the DT admissibility NN of IN evidence NN at IN civilian JJ trials NNS or CC the DT constitutionality NN of IN restrictions NNS on IN speech NN should MD henceforth RB be VB subject JJ to TO second JJ guessing VVG by IN a DT panel NN of IN soldiers NNS . SENT We PP d NN of IN course NN think VVP that DT was VBD madness NN . SENT But CC not RB this DT . SENT No RB , , as RB with IN other JJ vagaries NNS of IN life NN that IN our PP$ obsessively RB litigious JJ society NN has VHZ delegated VVN to TO the DT courts NNS , , who WP is VBZ an DT enemy NN combatant NN . SENT is VBZ now RB a DT legal JJ question NN , , not RB a DT battlefield NN reality NN . SENT And CC that IN s PP going VVG to TO make VV the DT battlefield NN a DT much RB more RBR dangerous JJ place NN for IN our PP$ troops NNS as IN judges NNS , , law NN professors NNS , , human JJ rights NNS activists NNS and CC , , yes UH , , senators NNS continue VVP pretending VVG it PP is VBZ a DT place NN somehow RB akin JJ to TO the DT arena NN of IN domestic JJ policing VVG . SENT Consider VV this DT . SENT Cops VVZ are NN trained VVN to TO collect VV evidence NN methodically RB , , preserve VV it PP pristinely RB , , carefully RB interview NN subjects NNS and CC witnesses NNS , , and CC diligently RB write VV reports NNS . SENT Generally RB speaking VVG , , none NN of IN this DT goes VVZ on IN in IN the DT fog NN of IN war NN , , where WRB they PP would MD have VH the DT additional JJ urgent JJ concern NN of IN being VBG bombed VVN , , strafed VVN or CC captured VVN while IN assembling VVG the DT case NN . SENT Law NN enforcement NN officers NNS conduct VVP themselves PP in IN this DT step NN by IN step NN fashion NN because IN they PP know VVP judges NNS and CC defense NN lawyers NNS are VBP not RB going VVG to TO care VV months NNS or CC years NNS down IN the DT road NN , , when WRB the DT trial NN finally RB happens VVZ what WP stresses VVZ they PP may MD have VH been VBN under IN during IN their PP$ investigation NN . SENT Under IN the DT banner NN of IN due JJ process NN , , in IN a DT comfortable JJ courtroom NN far RB removed VVN from IN the DT exigencies NNS of IN the DT moment NN , , judges NNS are VBP going VVG to TO demand VV that IN the DT investigation NN has VHZ been VBN reliably RB enough RB conducted VVN to TO premise NN the DT severe JJ consequence NN of IN a DT jail NN sentence NN a DT weighty JJ standard NN in IN homage NN to TO the DT reality NN that IN the DT person NN whose WP$ liberty NN is VBZ to TO be VB deprived VVN has VHZ rights NNS under IN our PP$ Constitution NP . SENT Let VV s PP ignore VV for IN a DT moment NN that IN alien JJ enemy NN operatives NNS captured VVN overseas RB in IN wartime NN have VHP never RB come VVN into IN the DT jurisdiction NN of IN our PP$ courts NNS and CC don VV t NN have VHP rights NNS under IN our PP$ Constitution NP . SENT The DT simple JJ fact NN is VBZ . SENT our PP$ military JJ men NNS and CC women NNS are VBP not RB cops VVZ . SENT Theirs PP is VBZ not RB the DT job NN of IN the DT gumshoe NN . SENT Their PP$ task NN is VBZ to TO advance VV aggressively RB on IN military JJ objectives NNS . SENT If IN they PP capture VV the DT enemy NN , , it PP is VBZ in IN the DT chaos NN of IN combat NN and CC in IN lieu NN of IN killing VVG him PP something NN they PP have VHP not RB heretofore RB needed VVN a DT judge VVP s PP permission NN to TO do VV but CC stay VV tuned VVN perhaps RB the DT Senate NP will MD get VV around RP to TO that DT , , too RB . SENT Our PP$ troops NNS are VBP the DT greatest JJS fighting NN force NN in IN the DT history NN of IN the DT planet NN largely RB because IN of IN the DT single JJ mindedness NN with IN which WDT they PP go VVP about IN their PP$ business NN . SENT They PP are VBP not RB expected VVN to TO stop VV along IN the DT way NN , , to TO take VV notes NNS , , and CC to TO preserve VV evidence NN . SENT They PP are VBP not RB trained VVN to TO think VV that IN when WRB they PP grant VVP quarter NN , , when WRB they PP capture VV an DT enemy NN rather RB than IN killing VVG him PP , , the DT fallout NN of IN that DT act NN of IN mercy NN will MD be VB courtroom NN litigation NN . SENT That IN , , however RB , , will MD be VB the DT new JJ reality NN . SENT Long RB after IN the DT heat NN of IN the DT battle NN , , a DT panel NN of IN U NP . SENT S NP . SENT judges NNS will MD now RB evaluate VV their PP$ decisions NNS . SENT A DT panel NN of IN robed VVN lawyers NNS will MD second RB guess VV the DT determination NN of IN their PP$ commanders NNS on IN scene NN that IN certain JJ captives NNS warranted VVN detention NN that IN holding VVG them PP would MD be VB beneficial JJ to TO the DT war NN effort NN you PP may MD remember VV , , there EX s PP a DT war VV we PP re IN supposed VVN to TO be VB trying VVG to TO win VV . SENT Beneficial JJ either CC for IN intelligence NN purposes NNS , , or CC to TO prevent VV them PP from IN rejoining VVG the DT jihad NN as IN we PP know VVP several JJ combatants NNS have VHP done VVN precisely RB because IN of IN the DT political JJ pressure NN caused VVN by IN those DT agitating VVG on IN their PP$ behalf NN . SENT On IN what WP standard NN of IN proof NN . SENT Must MD our PP$ troops NNS prove VV their PP$ captives NNS are VBP enemy NN combatants NNS beyond IN a DT reasonable JJ doubt NN . SENT By IN a DT preponderance NN of IN the DT evidence NN . SENT Must MD there RB have VH been VBN probable JJ cause NN . SENT We PP re IN not RB told VVN . SENT Is VBZ Congress NP going VVG to TO supply VV the DT standard NN or CC allow VV the DT courts NNS to TO make VV it PP up RP as IN they PP go VVP along IN which WDT always RB trends NNS in IN favor NN of IN increased JJ rights NNS for IN defendants NNS . SENT We PP re NN , , again RB , , not RB told VVD . SENT We PP can MD be VB sure JJ of IN one CD thing NN . SENT if IN Congress NP does VVZ not RB build VV in IN a DT standard NN that WDT is VBZ broadly RB deferential JJ to TO military JJ decisions NNS in IN wartime NN , , this DT Senate NP compromise NN will MD ultimately RB transform VV the DT military JJ commissions NNS into IN the DT very RB criminal JJ trials NNS the DT commissions NNS were VBD set VVN up RP to TO avoid VV . SENT ANOTHER DT INTELLIGENCE NN DEBACLE NN And CC it PP gets VVZ worse JJR . SENT As IN we PP know VVP from IN numerous JJ investigations NNS since IN 9 CD 11 CD that WDT have VHP critiqued VVN American JJ intelligence NN , , our PP$ informational JJ assets NNS overseas RB are VBP sparse JJ . SENT We PP rely VVP , , heavily RB , , on IN foreign JJ services NNS . SENT Up RB until IN now RB , , those DT services NNS who WP are VBP just RB as RB concerned VVN about IN their PP$ precious JJ methods NNS and CC sources NNS of IN information NN as IN we PP are VBP about IN ours PP have VHP agreed VVN to TO share VV intelligence NN with IN us PP because IN they PP haven NN t NN needed VVN to TO worry VV about IN its PP$ being VBG exposed VVN in IN American JJ judicial JJ proceedings NNS . SENT Well RB , , that DT solace NN just RB ended VVN . SENT If IN U NP . SENT S NP . SENT judges NNS , , applying VVG some DT standard NN of IN proof NN , , are VBP now RB going VVG to TO decide VV whether IN some DT terrorist NN was VBD properly RB deemed VVN an DT enemy NN combatant NN , , they PP are VBP going VVG to TO want VV to TO know VV what WP that DT intelligence NN was VBD . SENT In IN the DT name NN of IN courtroom NN due JJ process NN , , they PP are VBP no DT doubt NN going VVG to TO want VV to TO ensure VV that IN the DT validity NN of IN that DT intelligence NN was VBD adequately RB challenged VVN that IN the DT terrorist NN and CC his PP$ you PP can MD bet VV taxpayer NN subsidized JJ lawyer NN got VVD access NN to TO the DT information NN and CC a DT full JJ and CC fair JJ opportunity NN to TO poke VV holes NNS in IN it PP . SENT Under IN those DT circumstances NNS , , why WRB would MD foreign JJ intelligence NN services NNS continue VVP to TO share VV their PP$ information NN with IN us PP at IN current JJ levels NNS . SENT Intelligence NN that WDT helps VVZ protect VV our PP$ forces NNS and CC facilitates VVZ the DT accomplishment NN of IN our PP$ military JJ objectives NNS . SENT And CC it PP doesn NN t NN matter NN that IN the DT judges NNS will MD try VV to TO be VB responsible JJ in IN setting VVG due JJ process NN guidelines NNS about IN the DT dissemination NN of IN this DT information NN . SENT What WP matters VVZ is VBZ incentives NNS . SENT American JJ judicial JJ proceedings NNS are VBP justifiably RB well RB known VVN for IN the DT generous JJ disclosure NN of IN sensitive JJ government NN information NN that IN they PP accord NN to TO defendants NNS . SENT Foreign JJ intelligence NN services NNS are VBP well RB aware JJ of IN that DT reputation NN . SENT If IN they PP become VVP concerned JJ about IN it PP , , as IN they PP will MD , , the DT easiest JJS and CC most RBS sensible JJ thing NN for IN them PP to TO do VV is VBZ stop VV telling VVG us PP what WP they PP know VVP . SENT Why WRB are VBP we PP risking VVG the DT national JJ security NN debacle NN of IN saddling VVG our PP$ troops NNS with IN the DT burdens NNS of IN criminal JJ investigators NNS and CC denying VVG them PP precious JJ intelligence NN . SENT All RB so RB that IN we PP can MD impress VV with IN our PP$ high JJ mindedness NN people NNS who WP elevate VV fairness NN to TO homicidal JJ maniacs NNS over IN the DT lives NNS of IN innocents NNS . SENT It PP bears VVZ remembering VVG , , though RB , , that IN it PP was VBD by IN making VVG just RB this DT calculation NN by IN valuing VVG the DT asserted VVD civil JJ liberties NNS of IN terrorists NNS over IN the DT safety NN of IN the DT American JJ people NNS that IN we PP paved VVD the DT way NN for IN 9 CD 11 CD . SENT In IN the DT Senate NP , , it PP appears VVZ to TO be VB September NP 10 CD th NN all RB over IN again RB . SENT SLOWLY RB BUT CC SURELY RB , , COMMISSIONS NNS BECOME VVP TRIALS NNS In IN any DT event NN , , the DT fairness NN doesn NN t NN stop NN with IN judicial JJ control NN over IN the DT combatant JJ status NN determination NN . SENT Graham NP also RB said VVD the DT compromise NN provides VVZ that IN each DT terrorist NN will MD be VB able JJ to TO challenge VV in IN court NN whether IN his PP$ conviction NN followed VVD the DT military JJ commission NN procedures NNS in IN place NN . SENT But CC wait VV a DT minute NN . SENT Isn NN t NN that IN exactly RB what WP criminal JJ defendants NNS get VVP to TO do VV in IN civilian JJ courts NNS . SENT Yes UH , , of IN course NN it PP is VBZ . SENT You PP can MD already RB see VV how WRB this DT plays VVZ out RP . SENT The DT combatants NNS will MD challenge VV various JJ alleged JJ errors NNS in IN their PP$ military JJ commission NN proceedings NNS which WDT will MD undoubtedly RB reflect VV ways NNS in IN which WDT the DT commissions NNS fall VVP short RB of IN the DT defendant NN protections NNS that WDT obtain VVP in IN a DT regular JJ criminal JJ trial NN . SENT The DT courts NNS , , which WDT have VHP a DT fondness NN for IN those DT protections NNS , , having VHG created VVN most RBS of IN them PP , , will MD agree VV that IN the DT commissions NNS could MD stand VV this DT or CC that DT improvement NN in IN the DT spirit NN of IN due JJ process NN and CC the DT integrity NN of IN the DT proceedings NNS again RB , , for IN people NNS who WP are VBP entitled VVN to TO neither DT civilian JJ due JJ process NN nor CC civilian JJ courtroom NN proceedings NNS . SENT Before IN you PP know VVP it PP , , incrementally RB , , the DT commissions NNS will MD no RB longer RBR be VB a DT creation NN of IN the DT executive JJ branch NN carrying VVG out RP its PP$ constitutional JJ prerogative NN to TO deal VV with IN captured VVN enemy NN forces NNS . SENT More JJR and CC more JJR , , they PP will MD resemble VV civilian JJ criminal JJ trials NNS because IN the DT federal JJ courts NNS which WDT , , by IN the DT nature NN of IN their PP$ responsibilities NNS , , are VBP as RB much RB concerned VVN with IN justice NN for IN the DT accused VVN as IN the DT security NN of IN the DT American JJ people NNS will MD be VB second RB guessing VVG them PP at IN every DT turn NN . SENT Finally RB , , even RB though IN the DT senators NNS are VBP said VVN to TO be VB endorsing VVG the DT president NN s PP military JJ commissions NNS , , Graham NP indicated VVD that IN the DT door NN would MD be VB open JJ to TO the DT enemy NN to TO challenge VV the DT constitutionality NN of IN the DT whole JJ enterprise NN . SENT But CC just RB a DT second JJ , , you PP say VVP . SENT Non JJ Americans NPS who WP have VHP never RB entered VVN the DT United NP States NPS and CC are VBP held VVN overseas JJ don NN t NN have VHP rights NNS under IN the DT U NP . SENT S NP . SENT Constitution NP , , do VVP they PP . SENT How WRB can MD they PP contend VVP their PP$ constitutional JJ rights NNS were VBD violated VVN . SENT They PP can MD do VV so RB by IN having VHG their PP$ very RB effective JJ , , publicly RB subsidized VVN lawyers NNS look VVP the DT judges NNS in IN the DT eye NN and CC say VVP . SENT We PP are VBP here RB . SENT The DT U NP . SENT S NP . SENT Congress NP gave VVD us PP access NN to TO this DT court NN system NN because IN it PP believed VVD we PP belonged VVD here RB , , because IN it PP believed VVD we PP had VHD rights NNS and CC interests NNS to TO be VB vindicated VVN and CC protected VVN . SENT Certainly RB you PP judges NNS don VV t NN think VVP they PP sent VVD us PP to TO you PP as IN an DT empty JJ gesture NN . SENT And CC you PP can MD take VV this DT to TO the DT bank NN . SENT The DT judges NNS won VVD t NN treat VV it PP as IN an DT empty JJ gesture NN . SENT Remember VV , , U NP . SENT S NP . SENT courts NNS have VHP already RB determined VVN at IN one CD time NN or CC another DT in IN the DT last JJ year NN and CC a DT half NN that IN our PP$ enemies NNS have VHP a DT right NN to TO be VB in IN court NN , , a DT right NN to TO free JJ counsel NN and CC investigative JJ resources NNS , , and CC a DT right NN to TO be VB treated VVN as IN honorable JJ prisoners NNS of IN war NN under IN the DT Geneva NP Conventions NNS a DT ruling NN that WDT was VBD later RBR reversed VVN but CC is VBZ being VBG appealed VVN . SENT These DT are VBP all DT steps NNS the DT courts NNS took VVD before IN the DT Senate NP decided VVD to TO put VV them PP in IN charge NN . SENT What WP should MD we PP imagine VV they PP ll RB do VVP once IN Congress NP has VHZ handed VVN them PP the DT reins NNS . SENT COMPROMISE NN . SENT So RB how WRB is VBZ this DT a DT compromise NN . SENT What WP did VVD those DT who WP seemed VVD to TO have VH won VVN last JJ week NN retain VV of IN their PP$ victory NN . SENT They PP got VVD some DT window NN dressing VVG . SENT The DT combatants NNS will MD not RB be VB permitted VVN to TO further RBR flood VV the DT courts NNS with IN cascading JJ complaints NNS about IN the DT conditions NNS of IN their PP$ confinement NN . SENT Big JJ deal NN . SENT Those DT claims NNS were VBD frivolous JJ anyway RB . SENT Guantanamo NP detainees NNS receive VVP solicitous JJ treatment NN accommodations NNS to TO their PP$ religious JJ practice NN , , recreation NN time NN , , and CC they PP eat VVP better JJR than IN you PP do VVP . SENT Besides RB , , such JJ concerns NNS are VBP not RB the DT important JJ ones NNS . SENT The DT important JJ ones NNS are VBP about RB who WP gets VVZ to TO direct VV the DT war NN effort NN . SENT Up RB until IN now RB , , that WDT s PP been VBN the DT commander NN in IN chief JJ and CC the DT military JJ free JJ to TO detain VV enemy NN combatants NNS based VVN on IN their PP$ professional JJ assessment NN of IN who WP has VHZ intelligence NN that WDT might MD help VV us PP prevail VV , , and CC who WP is VBZ likely JJ to TO start VV killing VVG our PP$ soldiers NNS and CC our PP$ citizens NNS again RB if IN released VVN . SENT But CC if IN this DT compromise NN becomes VVZ law NN , , the DT question NN will MD be VB whether IN civilian JJ judges NNS are VBP satisfied VVN that IN al NP Qaeda NP s PP rights NNS have VHP been VBN respected VVN . SENT Andrew NP C NP . SENT McCarthy NP , , a DT former JJ federal JJ prosecutor NN , , is VBZ a DT senior JJ fellow NN at IN the DT Foundation NP for IN the DT Defense NN of IN Democracies NNS . SENT YOU PP RE IN NOT RB A DT SUBSCRIBER NN TO TO NATIONAL NP REVIEW NP . SENT Sign VV up RP right RB now RB . SENT It PP s PP easy JJ . SENT Subscribe VV to TO National NP Review NP here RB , , or CC to TO the DT digital JJ version NN of IN the DT magazine NN here RB . SENT You PP can MD even RB order VV a DT subscription NN as IN a DT gift NN . SENT print NN or CC digital JJ . SENT The DT latest JJS . SENT Snatching VVG Defeat NN from IN the DT Jaws NN of IN Victory NP 11 CD 16 CD Say VV No UH to TO the DT McCain NP Amendment NP 11 CD 15 CD Restoring VVG Law NP Order NP 11 CD 14 CD Islam NP , , Democracy NN Assimilation NN 11 CD 02 CD Previous JJ Articles NNS The DT ConnectionStephen NP Hayes NP explains VVZ how WRB al NP Qaeda's NP collaboration NN with IN Saddam NP Hussein NP has VHZ endangered VVN America NP . SENT Buy VV it PP through IN NR NP The DT Editors NNS . SENT Sunshine NP Senators NNS 11 CD 16 CD 1 CD . SENT 54 CD p NN . SENT m NN . SENT Ponnuru NP . SENT The DT Alito NP Precedent NN 11 CD 16 CD 12 CD . SENT 56 CD p NN . SENT m NN . SENT Seipp NP . SENT Scheer NP Madness NN 11 CD 16 CD 8 CD . SENT 52 CD a DT . SENT m NN . SENT Gross JJ . SENT Science NP Standards NPS 11 CD 16 CD 8 CD . SENT 51 CD a DT . SENT m NN . SENT Ijaz NP . SENT Out RB of IN Disaster NN , , Innovation NN 11 CD 16 CD 8 CD . SENT 48 CD a DT . SENT m NN . SENT Samples NNS . SENT Reid NP This DT 11 CD 16 CD 8 CD . SENT 46 CD a DT . SENT m NN . SENT Murray NP . SENT Do VV It PP Yourself PP Legislation NP 11 CD 16 CD 8 CD . SENT 44 CD a DT . SENT m NN . SENT Harris NP . SENT You PP Give VV Country NP a DT Bad JJ Name NN 11 CD 16 CD 8 CD . SENT 43 CD a DT . SENT m NN . SENT Goldberg NP . SENT Harry's NP Mirage NP 11 CD 16 CD 8 CD . SENT 41 CD a DT . SENT m NN . SENT Lopez NP . SENT Selective JJ Memories NP 11 CD 16 CD 8 CD . SENT 38 CD a DT . SENT m NN . SENT Hodge NP Williams NP . SENT Who WP Profits NNS at IN the DT Pump NP . SENT 11 CD 16 CD 8 CD . SENT 37 CD a DT . SENT m NN . SENT Cooper NP . SENT Let VV the DT Borking NP Begin NP 11 CD 16 CD 8 CD . SENT 36 CD a DT . SENT m NN . SENT Miller NP . SENT Boxer NP Shorts NP 11 CD 16 CD 8 CD . SENT 34 CD a DT . SENT m NN . SENT McCarthy NP . SENT Snatching VVG Defeat NN from IN the DT Jaws NN of IN Victory NP 11 CD 16 CD 8 CD . SENT 31 CD a DT . SENT m NN . SENT Looking VVG for IN a DT story NN . SENT Click NN here RB NRO NP Marketplace NN . SENT . SENT . SENT save IN 20 CD 30 CD today NN . SENT Home NN Find VVP an DT Article NP Find VVP an DT Author NN Advertise VVP Subscribe VV Help NN