/Users/andrea/_magisterarbeit/korpus/clean/trainkorpus/9/file_102i.html NN ----------------------------------------- : Comment NN . SENT The DT difference NN between IN these DT two CD versions NNS of IN the DT law NN on IN political JJ parties NNS is VBZ so RB subtle JJ as RB to TO be VB nearly RB nonexistent JJ , , and CC leads VVZ directly RB to TO the DT question NN of IN how WRB , , or CC even RB whether IN , , Tajik NP law NN currently RB differentiates VVZ between IN religious JJ organizations NNS and CC political JJ parties NNS which WDT are VBP based VVN on IN religion NN . SENT If IN there EX is VBZ no DT legal JJ definition NN of IN either DT term NN , , then RB it PP is VBZ more JJR than IN likely JJ that IN the DT Islamic NP Renaissance NP Party NP IRP NP Said NP Abdullo NP Nuri NP and CC Ali NP Akbar NP Turajonzoda's NP party NN , , and CC the DT strongest JJS force NN in IN the DT UTO NP will MD meet VV with IN many JJ more JJR obstacles NNS as IN the DT parliamentary JJ elections NNS approach NN . SENT The DT recent JJ conflict NN over IN the DT political JJ parties NNS law NN passed VVN by IN the DT Tajik NP parliament NN at IN the DT end NN of IN May NP , , in IN addition NN to TO highlighting VVG the DT serious JJ rifts NNS that WDT still RB exist VVP between IN the DT UTO NP and CC President NP Rahmonov's NP administration NN , , also RB illustrate VVP clearly RB the DT weaknesses NNS in IN the DT inter VV Tajik NP peace NN agreement NN . SENT The DT agreement NN calls VVZ for IN actions NNS which WDT are VBP not RB sanctioned VVN by IN Tajikistan's NP current JJ body NN of IN laws NNS many JJ of IN which WDT date NN back RB to TO Soviet JJ days NNS . SENT Furthermore RB , , it PP is VBZ not RB absolutely RB clear VV whose WP$ decisions NNS carry VVP more JJR weight NN the DT National NP Reconciliation NN Commission NP NRC NP , , or CC the DT Tajik NP parliament NN . SENT The DT NRC NP is VBZ indeed RB responsible JJ for IN proposing VVG amendments NNS to TO Tajikistan's NP election NN laws NNS , , but CC the DT peace NN agreement NN does VVZ not RB state VV whether IN it PP is VBZ necessary JJ for IN the DT legislature NN to TO accept VV these DT proposals NNS in IN order NN for IN them PP to TO become VV law NN , , and CC what WP steps NNS should MD be VB taken VVN if IN the DT legislature NN rejects VVZ any DT of IN the DT NRC's NP suggestions NNS . SENT In IN other JJ Central JJ Asian JJ republics NNS , , the DT president NN has VHZ sufficient JJ authority NN to TO order VV the DT legislature NN to TO accept VV certain JJ measures NNS . SENT Whether IN this DT is VBZ also RB the DT case NN in IN Tajikistan NP , , President NP Rahmonov NP has VHZ thus RB far RB refrained VVN from IN exerting VVG pressure NN on IN the DT Tajik NP parliament NN to TO accept VV the DT NRC's NP proposals NNS , , or CC to TO keep VV its PP$ actions NNS in IN line NN with IN the DT terms NNS of IN the DT peace NN agreement NN . SENT But CC then RB President NP Rahmonov NP himself PP seems VVZ reluctant JJ to TO carry VV out RP the DT requirements NNS of IN the DT peace NN agreement's NNS political JJ protocol NN . SENT