/Users/andrea/_magisterarbeit/korpus/clean/testkorpus/36/file_101.html NN ----------------------------------------- : Ipecac NN Reverse NN peristalsis NN for IN consumers NNS of IN culture NN . SENT February NP 28 CD , , 2004 CD The DT FMA NP , , a DT shot NN gun NN wedding NN As RB has VHZ been VBN stated VVN here RB before RB , , certain JJ variants NNS of IN conservative JJ ideology NN pose VV a DT grave NN and CC gathering NN threat NN to TO our PP$ civilization NN . SENT This DT has VHZ become VVN especially RB clear JJ in IN the DT debate NN surrounding VVG gay JJ marriage NN . SENT We PP are VBP all RB familiar JJ with IN the DT conservatives NNS tired JJ mantras NNS on IN this DT issue NN . SENT They PP are VBP more RBR overplayed VVN than IN the DT lastest JJS singles NNS being VBG pushed VVN by IN the DT record NN companies NNS and CC Clear NP Channel NP Radio NP . SENT Lisa NP Schiffren NP , , however RB , , seems VVZ to TO think VV we PP haven't NN heard VVD them PP yet RB . SENT The DT first JJ concerns NNS so RB called VVD activist JJ judges NNS . SENT Schiffren NP writes VVZ , , Whether IN you PP favor VVP gay JJ marriage NN or CC not RB , , it PP should MD be VB a DT concern NN when WRB judges NNS and CC officials NNS decide VVP to TO circumvent VV the DT democratic JJ process NN on IN a DT core JJ issue NN . SENT Perhaps RB Schiffren NP hasn't NP read VVD the DT constitution NN recently RB , , but CC it PP provides VVZ for IN an DT independent JJ judiciary NN , , whose WP$ power NN shall MD extend VV to TO all DT cases NNS , , in IN law NN and CC equity NN , , arising VVG under IN this DT Constitution NP . SENT It PP is VBZ thus RB an DT integral JJ part NN of IN the DT democratic JJ process NN , , not RB its PP$ circumvention NN . SENT The DT second NN involves VVZ a DT trumped VVN up RP claim NN regarding VVG civilization NN or CC culture NN . SENT Schriffren NNS again RB . SENT Marriage NN , , defined VVN as IN one CD man NN and CC one CD woman NN , , has VHZ been VBN a DT foundation NN of IN our PP$ culture NN for IN millenniums NNS . SENT However RB , , once RB upon IN a DT time NN , , millenarians NNS and CC alarmists NNS made VVD the DT same JJ argument NN regarding VVG slavery NN , , defined VVN as IN the DT ownership NN of IN one CD person NN by IN another DT . SENT In IN any DT case NN , , Schiffren NP is VBZ wrong JJ . SENT Marriage NN and CC marry VV are NN derived VVN from IN the DT Latin JJ maritatus NN and CC maritare NN , , which WDT mean VVP only RB to TO wed VVN , , marry VV , , or CC give VV in IN marriage NN , , and CC contain VV no DT reference NN to TO one CD man NN and CC one CD woman NN . SENT More RBR outrageously RB , , however RB , , she PP goes VVZ on IN to TO claim VV that DT marriage NN is VBZ one CD of IN a DT few JJ institutions NNS that WDT hold VVP up RP democracy NN . SENT Yet RB the DT institution NN of IN marriage NN is VBZ not RB even RB mentioned VVN in IN the DT constitution NN , , or CC is VBZ it PP . SENT In IN any DT case NN , , it PP is VBZ also RB equally RB effective JJ in IN holding VVG up RP totalitarian JJ states NNS and CC absolutist NN dictatorships NNS . SENT Perhaps RB Schiffren NP is VBZ merely RB projecting VVG . SENT After IN all DT , , it PP is VBZ the DT Bush NP administration NN that WDT is VBZ currently RB holding VVG up RP our PP$ democracy NN . SENT No UH . SENT True UH , , they're NNS not RB wearing VVG ski JJ masks NNS . SENT link NN posted VVD by IN sanson NP . SENT 7 CD . SENT 37 CD PM NP Capitalism NN . SENT code NN for IN economic JJ absolutism NN Due JJ to TO one CD of IN the DT greatest JJS ideological JJ mystifications NNS of IN our PP$ time NN , , many JJ mainstream NN conservatives NNS seem VVP not RB to TO realize VV that IN what WP they PP refer VVP to TO as IN conservatism NN is VBZ in IN reality NN nothing NN other JJ than IN classical JJ liberalism NN , , and CC because IN whether IN due JJ to TO intellectual JJ laziness NN , , or CC general JJ lack NN of IN interest NN they PP draw VVP few JJ distinctions NNS among IN their PP$ ideological JJ opponents NNS on IN the DT left NN , , lumping VVG all DT into IN the DT same JJ liberal JJ bin NN , , the DT left JJ liberal JJ roots NNS of IN many JJ right JJ wing NN pseudo JJ intellectuals NNS and CC neocons NNS are VBP revealed VVN in IN their PP$ fascination NN with IN left JJ wing NN factionalism NN . SENT Tipped VVD off RP by IN David NP Horowitz NP , , it PP only RB recently RB dawned VVN on IN the DT editorial JJ staff NN at IN the DT Washington NP Times NP , , for IN instance NN , , that IN there EX are VBP differences NNS to TO be VB found VVN between IN Left NP , , Far NP Left NP and CC Radical JJ Left NP . SENT One CD of IN the DT most RBS interesting JJ ironies NNS to TO result VV from IN the DT sensationalist NN alarmism NN popular JJ in IN rags NNS like IN Horowitz's NP Front NP Page NP Magazine NP is VBZ the DT right JJ wing NN defense NN of IN liberalism NN . SENT This DT is VBZ accomplished VVN mostly RB by IN untimely JJ ideologues NNS who WP still RB battle VVP communism NN as IN if IN we PP were VBD living VVG in IN the DT 1950 CD s PP . SENT This DT week NN , , Barry NP Loberfeld NP does VVZ the DT dirty JJ work NN . SENT His PP$ claim NN . SENT That IN the DT progressive JJ movement NN for IN social JJ justice NN is VBZ nothing NN other JJ than IN the DT Trojan NP Horse NP of IN Stalinist JJ totalitarianism NN . SENT This DT man NN likely RB believes VVZ that WDT had VHD Martin NP Luther NP King NP Jr NP . SENT been VBN allowed VVN to TO live VV , , we'd VV all RB be VB toiling VVG in IN MLK NP memorial NN gulags NNS . SENT In IN any DT case NN , , it PP is VBZ clear JJ that IN in IN the DT guise NN of IN defending VVG classical JJ liberalism NN against IN its PP$ supposed VVN opponents NNS on IN the DT modern JJ left NN , , Loberfeld NP engages VVZ in IN an DT underhanded JJ brand NN of IN historical JJ revisionism NN to TO absolve VV the DT right NN of IN its PP$ complicity NN in IN the DT rise NN of IN fascism NN in IN the DT twentieth JJ century NN . SENT Just RB a DT few JJ notes NNS . SENT . SENT . SENT Loberfeld NP severs VVZ social JJ justice NN from IN liberalism NN by IN locating VVG its PP$ origin NN in IN Marx's NP critique NN of IN classical JJ political JJ economy NN . SENT Not RB only RB is VBZ this DT reductive JJ to TO the DT point NN of IN vulgarity NN , , it PP is VBZ obfuscatory JJ . SENT The DT term NN social JJ justice NN itself PP was VBD coined VVN by IN an DT Italian JJ , , and CC delineated VVD by IN J NP . SENT S NP . SENT Mill NP , , who WP , , as IN you PP know VVP , , was VBD not RB a DT Communist JJ , , but CC rather RB a DT liberal NN . SENT It PP is VBZ with IN such JJ omissions NNS that IN Loberfeld NP turns VVZ the DT advocates NNS of IN social JJ justice NN into IN the DT opponents NNS of IN the DT revolt NN against IN political JJ absolutism NN . SENT Loberfeld NP continues VVZ . SENT With IN a DT government NN e NN . SENT g NN . SENT , , a DT monarchy NN that WDT is VBZ granted VVN absolute JJ power NN , , it PP is VBZ impossible JJ to TO speak VV of IN any DT injustice NN on IN its PP$ part NN . SENT If IN it PP can MD do VV anything NN , , it PP can't VVD do VV anything NN wrong JJ . SENT Justice NP as IN a DT political JJ legal JJ term NN can MD begin VV only RB when WRB limitations NNS are VBP placed VVN upon IN the DT sovereign JJ , , i NP . SENT e SYM . SENT , , when WRB men NNS define VV what WP is VBZ unjust JJ for IN government NN to TO do VV . SENT In IN his PP$ defense NN of IN monarchical JJ absolutism NN , , Thomas NP Hobbes NP showed VVD that DT nothing NN the DT Sovereign NP Representative NP i NP . SENT e SYM . SENT the DT monarch NN can MD do VV to TO a DT subject NN . SENT . SENT . SENT can MD properly RB be VB called VVN injustice NN . SENT But CC he PP also RB allowed VVD that IN there EX are VBP things NNS which WDT a DT subject NN , , though RB commanded VVN by IN the DT Sovereign NP , , may MD nevertheless RB , , without IN injustice NN , , refuse VVP to TO do VV . SENT Thus RB justice NN , , as IN a DT political JJ legal JJ term NN did VVD not RB arise VV as IN a DT revolt NN against IN political JJ absolutism NN , , as IN Loberfeld NP fantasizes VVZ , , rather RB it PP was VBD already RB extant JJ in IN the DT justification NN of IN monarchical JJ absolutism NN itself PP . SENT And CC it PP is VBZ likely JJ for IN this DT reason NN that IN it PP was VBD effectively RB exploited VVN by IN the DT advocates NNS of IN revolt NN . SENT This DT error NN and CC oversight NN infects VVZ the DT whole NN of IN Loberfeld's NP argument NN . SENT Though IN he PP alludes VVZ to TO Hayek NP to TO draw VV a DT distinction NN between IN liberal JJ and CC social JJ justice NN , , he PP cannot JJ help NN but CC fetishize VV formal JJ equality NN in IN his PP$ assessments NNS of IN our PP$ material NN existence NN . SENT Thus RB does VVZ the DT specter NN of IN legalist JJ absolutism NN haunt VV his PP$ rhetoric NN , , and CC inform VV his PP$ fanatical JJ devotion NN to TO a DT nonexistent JJ political JJ equality NN . SENT And CC he PP is VBZ thereby RB led VVN to TO disavow VV the DT obvious JJ but CC difficult JJ truth NN that IN classes NNS still RB exist VVP in IN capitalism NN . SENT Ironically RB , , and CC it PP seems VVZ the DT irony NN is VBZ lost VVN on IN him PP , , Loberfeld NP praises VVZ capitalism NN for IN having VHG achieved VVN the DT communist's NNS utopia NN , , the DT classless JJ society NN . SENT Since IN he PP has VHZ to TO rely VV on IN Hayek NP to TO determine VV that IN the DT subject NN of IN liberal JJ justice NN is VBZ a DT a DT flesh NN and CC blood NN person NN , , who WP is VBZ held VVN accountable JJ for IN only RB those DT actions NNS that WDT constitute VVP specifically RB defined VVN crimes NNS , , it PP is VBZ of IN little JJ wonder NN that IN he PP is VBZ unable JJ to TO figure VV out RP that IN governments NNS and CC corporations NNS , , which WDT are VBP treated VVN as IN legal JJ persons NNS , , are VBP the DT subject NN of IN social JJ justice NN because IN they PP too RB must MD be VB held VVN accountable JJ for IN those DT actions NNS that WDT constitute VVP specifically RB defined VVN crimes NNS . SENT Loberfeld NP concludes VVZ by IN equating VVG social JJ justice NN with IN socialism NN and CC Oriental JJ despotism NN via IN Marx NP . SENT In IN his PP$ intellectual JJ dishonesty NN , , he PP cannot VV even RB bring VV himself PP to TO mention VV that IN an DT understanding NN of IN Marx's NP vehement JJ critique NN of IN utopian JJ socialism NN is VBZ necessary JJ to TO properly RB assess VV his PP$ take NN on IN classical JJ liberalism NN . SENT But CC one CD cannot NN expect VVP as RB much RB from IN Front NP Page NP Magazine NP . SENT They PP don't VVD know VV their PP$ Marx NP . SENT link NN posted VVD by IN sanson NP . SENT 5 LS . SENT 50 CD AM NP February NP 26 CD , , 2004 CD The DT duopoly NN inside IN the DT duopoly NN Due JJ to TO their PP$ general JJ disregard NN for IN the DT most RBS elementary JJ rules NNS of IN logic NN , , style NN , , sense NN and CC composition NN , , it PP is VBZ sometimes RB difficult JJ to TO discern VV when WRB our PP$ beloved JJ corporate JJ news NN commentators NNS are VBP attempting VVG to TO be VB facetious JJ . SENT Sometimes RB , , in IN moments NNS of IN weakness NN , , when WRB I PP am VBP inclined VVN to TO lend VV the DT benefit NN of IN the DT doubt NN to TO some DT one NN of IN the DT louts NNS and CC scoundrels NNS who WP populate VV the DT editorial JJ pages NNS of IN the DT national JJ media NNS , , I PP remind VVP myself PP that IN there EX is VBZ no DT unreasonable JJ doubt NN when WRB the DT credibility NN of IN the DT journalistic JJ tripe NN which WDT today RB passes VVZ for IN intelligent JJ and CC informed JJ argumentation NN is VBZ at IN issue NN . SENT Yesterday NN , , Gail NP Collins NP checked VVD in IN at IN the DT New NP York NP Times NP as IN an DT Editorial JJ Observer NP to TO ponder VV why WRB four CD Democrats NNS will MD be VB participating VVG in IN the DT upcoming JJ debates NNS even RB though IN there EX are VBP only RB two CD candidates NNS for IN the DT Democratic JJ nomination NN . SENT Tlaura NP at IN Daily NP Kos NP points NNS out IN Collins NP cynical JJ arrogance NN , , and CC her PP$ ignorance NN of IN relevant JJ facts NNS pertaining VVG to TO her PP$ chosen VVN topic NN . SENT But CC for IN some DT reason NN tlaura NN is VBZ surprised VVN to TO encounter VV such PDT filch VV on IN the DT pages NNS of IN the DT New NP York NP Times NP . SENT Collins NP takes VVZ pains NNS to TO convince VV her PP$ readers NNS that IN since IN neither DT Sharpton NP nor CC Kucinich NP will MD win VV the DT nomination NN , , there EX should MD be VB no DT place NN for IN them PP in IN the DT primary JJ race NN . SENT They PP are VBP merely RB taking VVG up RP precious JJ space NN . SENT In IN order NN to TO make VV her PP$ case NN , , Collins NP erroneously RB , , and CC in IN all DT likelihood NN duplicitously RB , , claims NNS that IN Kucinich NP has VHZ yet RB to TO win VV a DT single JJ delegate NN . SENT In IN fact NN , , the DT day NN before IN her PP$ article NN was VBD published VVN , , Kucinich NP picked VVD up RP eight CD delegates NNS in IN Hawaii NP . SENT So IN either DT Collins NP didn't NN do VVP her PP$ research NN , , and CC she's NNS woefully RB incompetent JJ , , or CC she PP was VBD aware JJ of IN Kucinich's NP delegates NNS and CC suppressed VVD the DT information NN , , thusly RB providing VVG clear JJ evidence NN that IN she PP is VBZ little RB more JJR than IN a DT boot NN licking VVG propagandist NN for IN the DT duopoly NN inside IN the DT duopoly NN . SENT Let's NNS take VVP Collins NP position NN to TO its PP$ illogical JJ conclusion NN . SENT Indeed RB , , there EX might MD as RB well RB be VB only RB two CD Democratic JJ presidential JJ candidates NNS since IN the DT media NNS mass NN ignores VVZ any DT and CC all DT candidates NNS who WP do VVP not RB conform VV to TO their PP$ preconceived VVN and CC factitious JJ notions NNS of IN electability NN . SENT Despite IN this DT obvious JJ fact NN , , Collins NP asserts VVZ that IN marginal JJ candidates NNS are VBP using VVG up RP way NN more JJR than IN their PP$ share NN of IN political JJ coverage NN . SENT What WP political JJ coverage NN . SENT Is VBZ she PP referring VVG to TO the DT Times NP exhaustive JJ reportage NN on IN the DT Kucinich NP and CC Sharpton NP campaigns NNS . SENT Really RB , , you PP can't VVD help VV but CC wonder VV whether IN this DT woman NN is VBZ serious JJ . SENT Otherwise RB , , one PP can MD only RB conclude VV that IN the DT depth NN of IN her PP$ mendacity NN is VBZ matched VVN only RB by IN the DT superficiality NN of IN her PP$ analysis NN . SENT Almost RB unbelievably RB , , Collins NP alleges VVZ that IN the DT cast NN of IN characters NNS in IN the DT Democratic JJ primary JJ debates NNS is VBZ not RB the DT central JJ issue NN in IN American JJ democracy NN . SENT Put VVN aside RB for IN now RB the DT suspicion NN that IN this DT latter JJ syntagm NN is VBZ but RB nonsense JJ . SENT If IN hearing VVG out RP the DT candidates NNS who WP are VBP pursuing VVG their PP$ party's JJ nomination NN for IN the DT office NN of IN the DT president NN is VBZ not RB momentarily RB the DT central JJ issue NN in IN American JJ democracy NN , , there EX is VBZ no DT democracy NN in IN America NP . SENT Furthermore RB , , why WRB stop VV at IN two CD candidates NNS when WRB only RB one PP will MD get VV the DT nomination NN . SENT Why WRB bother VVP with IN primaries NNS and CC elections NNS at IN all DT only JJ to TO suffer VV through IN the DT four CD year NN term NN of IN whatever WDT piece NN of IN political JJ trash NN the DT corporatists NP install VV in IN the DT White NP House NP this DT time NN around RB . SENT Sadly RB , , many JJ folk NN likely RB heard VVD their PP$ own JJ views NNS echoed VVN in IN Collins NP fascistic JJ diatribe NN against IN the DT democratic JJ process NN and CC the DT national JJ debate NN . SENT Like IN homeland NN security NN , , the DT Democratic JJ primary NN is VBZ little RB more JJR than IN a DT miserable JJ charade NN . SENT link NN posted VVD by IN sanson NP . SENT 7 CD . SENT 34 CD PM NP Quid NN pro FW quo FW Given VVN that IN the DT American JJ middle NN class NN is VBZ willing JJ to TO sacrifice VV pensions NNS and CC health NN care NN today NN to TO save VV pennies NNS on IN the DT consumer NN dollar NN tomorrow NN , , it PP is VBZ not RB surprising JJ that IN the DT baby NN boomers NNS will MD likely RB give VV up RP on IN Social NP Security NP tomorrow NN for IN a DT three CD hundred CD dollar NN tax NN cut NN today NN . SENT link NN posted VVD by IN sanson NP . SENT 4 LS . SENT 40 CD AM NP The DT war NN on IN politics NNS The DT marriage NN question NN has VHZ the DT potential NN to TO split NN both CC the DT Republican JJ and CC Democratic JJ parties NNS , , and CC it PP should MD be VB exploited VVN to TO that DT end NN . SENT The DT President NP has VHZ outraged VVN both DT conservative JJ libertarians NNS and CC constitutional JJ conservationists NNS with IN his PP$ proposal NN to TO ban VV gay JJ marriage NN . SENT And CC many JJ left JJ liberals NNS are VBP frustrated VVN by IN the DT Democrats NPS general JJ unwillingness NN to TO come VV out RP in IN clear JJ support NN of IN it PP . SENT John NP Kerry NP does VVZ not RB support VV gay JJ marriage NN . SENT Even RB Howard NP Dean NP , , that DT radical JJ , , is VBZ against IN its PP$ legalization NN . SENT The DT movement NN to TO protect VV heterosexual JJ marriage NN by IN outlawing VVG gay JJ marriage NN is VBZ a DT slap NN in IN the DT face NN to TO conservative JJ gay JJ activists NNS , , since IN it PP is VBZ the DT top JJ priority NN on IN many JJ of IN their PP$ agendas NNS . SENT Bush NP has VHZ sacrificed VVN the DT support NN of IN these DT constituents NNS in IN order NN to TO appease VV social JJ conservatives NNS and CC the DT religious JJ right NN . SENT Gays NNS need VVP not RB apply VV at IN the DT RNC NP . SENT Now RB that IN no DT one NN can MD doubt VV whether IN or CC not RB Bush NP has VHZ begun VVN campaigning NN in IN earnest JJ , , mainstream JJ conservatives NNS who WP were VBD disappointed VVN with IN the DT state NN of IN union NN speech NN and CC Bush's NP poor JJ showing NN on IN Meet NP the DT Press NP have VHP breathed VVD a DT sigh NN of IN relief NN . SENT Bush NP enthusiasts NNS undoubtedly RB imagine VVP that IN the DT President NP only RB grudgingly RB enters VVZ into IN the DT fray NN . SENT Bush NP , , after IN all DT , , cannot VV hide VV his PP$ contempt NN when WRB he PP utters VVZ the DT word NN politics NNS . SENT And CC he PP has VHZ little JJ respect NN for IN the DT normal JJ push NN and CC shove VV of IN the DT political JJ process NN , , which WDT he PP likes VVZ to TO call VV playing VVG politics NNS . SENT Who WP can MD help VV but CC laugh VV when WRB a DT politician NN derides VVZ his PP$ or CC her PP$ colleagues NNS for IN politicizing VVG an DT issue NN . SENT Or CC when WRB one CD politician NN accuses VVZ another DT of IN politics NNS . SENT The DT popular JJ equation NN of IN politics NNS tout VV court NN with IN partisan JJ politics NNS as IN such JJ is VBZ the DT source NN of IN this DT irony NN . SENT Joseph NP Curl NP provides VVZ us PP with IN a DT recent JJ example NN . SENT Reporting VVG on IN Bush's NP stump NN speech NN , , he PP writes VVZ . SENT After IN abstaining VVG from IN politics NNS for IN months NNS as IN Democrats NPS attacked VVD him PP throughout IN their PP$ primary JJ season NN , , the DT president NN took VVD aim NN at IN presidential JJ front NN runner NN John NP Kerry NP . SENT Such PDT a DT statement NN could MD have VH been VBN produced VVN by IN any DT of IN the DT vapid JJ journalistic JJ drones NNS who WP do VVP data NN entry NN for IN the DT corporations NNS that WDT own VVP our PP$ representatives NNS . SENT The DT imagery NN makes VVZ one CD long RB for IN the DT good JJ old JJ days NNS when WRB politicians NNS would MD settle VV their PP$ disputes NNS with IN duelling VVG pistols NNS . SENT At IN least JJS we'd NN be VB spared VVN some RB of IN them PP . SENT Today NN , , however RB , , few JJ people NNS seem VVP inclined VVN to TO believe VV that DT war NN is VBZ simply RB the DT continuation NN of IN politics NNS by IN other JJ means NNS . SENT Instead RB we PP have VHP bluster NN . SENT In IN fact NN , , it PP is VBZ likely RB the DT taboo NN against IN politicizing VVG war NN that WDT has VHZ led VVN to TO the DT martialization NN of IN politics NNS . SENT It PP is VBZ easy JJ to TO imagine VV that DT simple NN minded VVD conservatives NNS would MD be VB outraged VVN if IN one CD were VBD to TO comment VV that DT Bush's NP decision NN to TO invade VV Iraq NP was VBD political JJ in IN nature NN , , while IN similarly RB minded VVD liberals NNS would MD undoubtedly RB feel VV some DT sort NN of IN satisfaction NN , , thinking VVG that IN the DT president NN had VHD been VBN insulted VVN . SENT In IN fact NN , , it PP seems VVZ most JJS people NNS cannot NN imagine VVP a DT politics NNS that WDT would MD be VB anything NN other JJ than IN bi NP partisan JJ bickering NN . SENT If IN only RB there EX were VBD an DT Augustine NP to TO speak VV out RP against IN such JJ Manicheaism NN . SENT Instead RB there EX is VBZ only RB Ralph NP Nader NP . SENT And CC this DT , , in IN itself PP , , is VBZ a DT sad JJ commentary NN upon IN the DT state NN of IN contemporary JJ American JJ politics NNS . SENT link NN posted VVD by IN sanson NP . SENT 2 LS . SENT 15 CD AM NP February NP 23 CD , , 2004 CD No DT mercy NN , , political JJ parties NNS are VBP special JJ interests NNS Is VBZ it PP not RB hilarious JJ that IN so RB many JJ Democrats NNS and CC liberals NNS assume VVP an DT air NN of IN confidence NN in IN the DT fight NN against IN Bush's NP campaign NN machine NN but CC are VBP petrified VVN by IN the DT thought NN of IN Ralph NP Nader's NP presidential JJ bid NN . SENT While IN Gore NP and CC Kerry NP among IN others NNS accuse VVP Bush NP of IN playing VVG upon IN people's NP fears NNS , , Democratic JJ Party NP drones NNS , , weak JJ kneed JJ liberals NNS and CC pseudo JJ leftists NNS declare VVP that DT Nader's NP candidacy NN portends VVZ catastrophe NN because IN it PP recalls VVZ Bush's NP s PP election NN four CD years NNS ago RB . SENT Let's NNS be VB clear JJ . SENT If IN the DT Democrats NPS are VBP in IN a DT strong JJ position NN today NN , , it PP is VBZ not RB because RB of IN anything NN they PP have VHP done VVN or CC accomplished VVN , , but CC rather RB because IN they PP are VBP not RB directly RB responsible JJ for IN the DT most RBS egregious JJ political JJ and CC governmental JJ scandals NNS which WDT have VHP come VVN to TO pass VV over IN the DT last JJ four CD years NNS . SENT The DT Democratic NP Party NP is VBZ re NN energized VVN because IN many JJ young JJ people NNS , , aghast JJ at IN Bush's NP presidency NN , , fell VVD prey NN once RB more RBR to TO the DT duopoly NN blackmail VV . SENT In IN a DT country NN where WRB only RB two CD thirds NNS of IN registered JJ voters NNS are VBP either DT Republicans NPS or CC Democrats NPS , , it PP is VBZ an DT outrage NN that IN anyone NN would MD speak VV out RP against IN a DT third JJ party NN candidate NN because IN such JJ candidacies NNS increase NN competition NN . SENT And CC it PP is VBZ telling VVG that IN a DT Democratic JJ governor NN would MD single VV out RP Ralph NP Nader's NP campaign NN for IN being VBG an DT act NN of IN vanity NN and CC ego NN satisfaction NN . SENT Perhaps RB Bill NP Richardson NP has VHZ yet RB to TO witness NN either CC Bush NP or CC Kerry NP in IN the DT act NN of IN self NN promotion NN . SENT The DT only JJ thing NN worse JJR than IN gutter NN politics NNS is VBZ character NN advertisement NN . SENT Media NP Whores VVZ Online JJ , , for IN instance NN , , stand VVP true JJ to TO their PP$ name NN , , and CC are VBP currently RB whoring VVG themselves PP for IN John NP Kerry NP , , exposing VVG details NNS of IN his PP$ impeccable JJ and CC courageous JJ personal JJ character NN . SENT Let's NNS not RB forget VVP that IN Kerry NP voted VVD to TO give VV Bush NP his PP$ war NN , , he PP voted VVD for IN Ashcroft's NP Patriot NN Act NP , , for IN No DT Child NN Left VVN Behind IN , , for IN free JJ trade NN agreements NNS like IN NAFTA NP and CC GATT NP which WDT contain VVP few JJ or CC no DT protections NNS for IN workers NNS or CC the DT environment NN , , or CC even RB human JJ rights NNS . SENT Sure RB he PP was VBD a DT leader NN in IN the DT anti JJ war NN movement NN in IN the DT early JJ seventies NNS , , but CC where WRB was VBD he PP in IN 2002 CD and CC 2003 CD . SENT He's NP received VVD millions NNS of IN dollars NNS in IN contributions NNS from IN corporate JJ special JJ interests NNS while IN decrying VVG others NNS for IN doing VVG the DT same JJ . SENT He PP did VVD not RB begin VV voting NN against IN various JJ pieces NNS of IN legislation NN being VBG pushed VVN by IN the DT Bush NP administration NN until IN he PP realized VVD it PP was VBD in IN the DT interests NNS of IN his PP$ presidential JJ campaign NN to TO do VV so IN Medicare NP and CC the DT Iraq NP supplemental JJ appropriations NNS bill NN stand VVP out RP . SENT And CC finally RB , , like IN Bush NP he's NNS a DT Bonesman NP . SENT Ipecac NN railed VVD against IN the DT left JJ liberal JJ establishment NN just RB last JJ week NN for IN embracing VVG the DT Democratic JJ party NN and CC the DT Republicratic JJ order NN . SENT With IN its PP$ coverage NN of IN Nader's NP announcement NN , , the DT New NP York NP TImes NNS proves VVZ yet RB again RB that IN it PP is VBZ little RB more JJR than IN an DT instrument NN of IN the DT DNC NN . SENT Likewise RB with IN the DT LA NP Times NP . SENT The DT FOX NN News NN article NN on IN Nader's NP announcement NN is VBZ more RBR informative JJ and CC relevant JJ than IN any DT from IN the DT so RB called VVN liberal JJ press NN . SENT Interestingly RB , , most JJS of IN the DT media NNS establishment NN are VBP in IN agreement NN that IN , , in IN the DT words NNS of IN Nick NP Anderson NP at IN the DT LA NP Times NP , , Had VHD Gore NP taken VVN a DT sliver NN of IN Nader's NP Florida NP vote NN or CC a DT third JJ of IN his PP$ New NP Hampshire NP vote NN , , he PP would MD have VH beaten VVN Bush NP . SENT The DT media NNS have VHP yet RB to TO realize VV , , or CC rather RB , , they PP continue VVP to TO cover VV up RP , , the DT fact NN that IN Gore NP won VVD Florida NP without IN Nader's NP help NN , , but CC lost VVD it PP with IN Katherine NP Harris NP . SENT Perhaps RB they PP are VBP simply RB afraid JJ to TO expose VV their PP$ own JJ negligence NN , , and CC their PP$ complicity NN in IN the DT fraud NN which WDT was VBD the DT Florida NP recount NN . SENT Perhaps RB , , like IN mainstream NN Democrats NNS , , they PP still RB fear VVP that DT intense JJ scrutiny NN of IN the DT ordeal NN would MD bring VV down RP the DT entire JJ system NN . SENT Imagine VV if IN the DT media NNS had VHD devoted VVN only RB half PDT the DT effort NN they PP expended VVN on IN scrutinizing VVG George NP Bush's NP National NP Guard NP records VVZ to TO what WP has VHZ come VVN to TO be VB called VVN Floridagate NP . SENT Yet RB , , if IN the DT newly RB installed VVN administration NN had VHD crumbled VVN under IN the DT pressure NN there RB would MD have VH been VBN no DT government NN to TO tell VV them PP what WP was VBD important JJ and CC what WP not RB . SENT But CC who WP , , in IN any DT case NN , , could MD believe VV that IN the DT parasites NNS and CC parrots NNS in IN the DT American JJ mass NN media NNS , , or CC the DT Congress NP for IN that DT matter NN , , would MD be VB so RB bold JJ as RB to TO take VV a DT long JJ hard JJ look NN at IN the DT crimes NNS that WDT were VBD committed VVN against IN the DT people NNS of IN the DT United NP States NPS in IN late JJ 2000 CD and CC early RB 2001 CD . SENT By IN scapegoating VVG Nader NP , , the DT Democratic JJ establishment NN and CC the DT liberal JJ media NNS cover VVP for IN the DT Republicans NPS who WP fixed VVD Florida NP . SENT Or CC have VH the DT liberals NNS simply RB forgotten VVN that IN Bush's NP election NN was VBD a DT coup NN . SENT If IN Terry NP McAuliffe NP had VHD any DT sense NN he PP would MD be VB reminding VVG people NNS that IN Bush NP stole VVD the DT election NN , , not RB that IN Nader NP participated VVD in IN it PP . SENT link NN posted VVD by IN sanson NP . SENT 2 LS . SENT 52 CD AM NP February NP 22 CD , , 2004 CD Bin NP Laden JJ . SENT cost NN benefit NN Amid IN rumors NNS that IN US NP and CC allied VVD forces NNS are VBP closing VVG in IN on IN Bin NP Laden JJ himself PP , , Ahmed NP Bouzid NP recently RB articulated VVD one NN of IN the DT most RBS shrewd JJ political JJ insights NNS to TO have VH occurred VVN to TO a DT Democrat NP in IN a DT long JJ time NN . SENT Democrats NPS must MD set VV the DT coordinates VVZ of IN the DT debate NN surrounding VVG and CC psychologically RB prepare VV the DT population NN for IN bin NN Laden's NP capture NN so IN that DT it's JJ political JJ effect NN can MD be VB controlled VVN . SENT This DT touches NNS upon IN one CD of IN the DT central JJ critiques NNS Democrats NNS and CC liberals NNS level NN against IN Bush's NP war NN in IN Iraq NP , , namely RB , , that IN it PP has VHZ distracted VVN the DT nation NN from IN more JJR pressing JJ concerns NNS in IN the DT war NN against IN terrorism NN , , specifically RB bin NN Laden's NP Al NP Qaeda NP . SENT We've NP all RB heard VVD it PP before RB . SENT Hey NP Mr NP . SENT Bush NP , , where's NN bin NN Laden JJ . SENT The DT question NN resonates VVZ with IN the DT public NN . SENT Though IN the DT President's NP supporters NNS , , in IN the DT face NN of IN such JJ criticism NN , , play VV down RP the DT significance NN of IN capturing VVG bin NN Laden JJ , , many JJ likely RB believe VVP that IN it PP would MD be VB one CD of IN the DT clearest JJS indications NNS of IN real JJ progress NN in IN the DT war NN on IN terror NN . SENT The DT mainstream NN logic NN here RB rests VVZ on IN the DT old JJ theory NN of IN decapitation NN . SENT to TO capture VV bin NN Laden JJ would MD be VB to TO cut VV off RP the DT head NN of IN the DT snake NN . SENT Even RB those DT who WP tend VVP not RB to TO stress VV the DT importance NN of IN capturing VVG bin NN Laden JJ subscribe VVP to TO the DT argument NN , , maintaining VVG that IN bin NN Laden's NP capture NN would MD be VB a DT symbolic JJ victory NN in IN the DT war NN on IN terror NN , , since IN he PP is VBZ no RB longer RBR planning VVG and CC executing VVG actions NNS and CC many JJ of IN his PP$ top JJ commanders NNS have VHP been VBN killed VVN or CC captured VVN . SENT Here RB bin NN Laden's NP death NN or CC imprisonment NN is VBZ viewed VVN primarily RB with IN respect NN to TO the DT war NN of IN ideas NNS which WDT is VBZ more RBR general JJ than IN the DT war NN on IN terrorism NN . SENT These DT positions NNS seem VVP overly RB simplistic JJ and CC naive JJ because IN they PP are VBP . SENT It PP may MD be VB that IN , , at IN the DT moment NN , , bin NN Laden JJ symbolically RB embodies VVZ and CC instantiates VVZ the DT forces NNS of IN global JJ terrorism NN only RB in IN the DT minds NNS of IN terrorism's JJ opponents NNS . SENT But CC of IN how WRB much JJ importance NN is VBZ bin NN Laden's NP real JJ body NN to TO the DT networks NNS , , symbolic JJ and CC otherwise RB , , of IN global JJ terrorism NN . SENT What WP about IN his PP$ image NN . SENT Will MD his PP$ capture NN or CC death NN at IN the DT hands NNS of IN US NP or CC allied VVD forces NNS actually RB rob VV Islamo NN fascism NN of IN its PP$ own JJ symbolic JJ instantiation NN in IN the DT figure NN of IN bin NN Laden JJ . SENT Could MD it PP not RB also RB catalyze VV a DT rebirth NN of IN Al NP Qaeda NP in IN newer JJR and CC nastier JJR forms NNS . SENT Bin NP Laden's NP real JJ defeat NN could MD very RB well RB become VV the DT occasion NN for IN his PP$ symbolic JJ victory NN . SENT There EX is VBZ little JJ doubt NN that IN upon IN his PP$ capture NN or CC death NN he PP will MD be VB hailed VVN as IN a DT martyr NN by IN his PP$ supporters NNS and CC sympathizers NNS . SENT Will MD Al NP Qaeda NP find VVP a DT new JJ beginning NN in IN bin NN Laden's NP sorry JJ end NN , , or CC has VHZ it PP been VBN effectively RB pushed VVN off RP the DT cliff NN but CC not RB yet RB fallen VVN because IN it PP has VHZ yet RB to TO look VV down RP . SENT There EX is VBZ no DT question NN as RB to TO which WDT of IN these DT alternatives NNS is VBZ preferable JJ , , but CC there EX is VBZ no DT way NN of IN predicting VVG which WDT way NN events NNS will MD turn VV . SENT And CC it PP does VVZ not RB help VV that IN US NP officials NNS and CC politicians NNS have VHP so RB little JJ to TO say VV about IN the DT capture NN of IN public JJ enemy NN number NN one NN beyond IN reiterating VVG that IN it PP has VHZ not RB happened VVN yet RB , , and CC stuttering VVG that IN they PP don't VVD know VV when WRB it PP will MD . SENT Perhaps RB bin NN Laden JJ has VHZ yet RB to TO be VB captured VVN precisely RB because IN the DT costs NNS were VBD determined VVN to TO outweigh VV the DT benefits NNS . SENT The DT coming VVG election NN certainly RB changes VVZ the DT equation NN . SENT link NN posted VVD by IN sanson NP . SENT 9 CD . SENT 49 CD PM NP February NP 21 CD , , 2004 CD Opium NN for IN the DT few JJ , , emetics NNS for IN the DT masses NNS There EX are VBP few JJ things NNS more RBR disconcerting VVG than IN the DT state NN of IN intellectual JJ barbarism NN into IN which WDT so RB many JJ Americans NNS have VHP plunged VVN themselves PP . SENT The DT Washington NP Times NP gleefully RB reported VVD this DT week NN that WDT most JJS Americans NPS take VVP bible JJ stories NNS literally RB . SENT For IN perspective NN , , the DT article NN quotes VVZ a DT Rev NP . SENT Charles NP Nalls NP saying VVG , , These DT are VBP surprising JJ and CC reassuring JJ figures NNS a DT positive JJ sign NN in IN a DT postmodern NN world NN that WDT seemed VVD bent NN on IN erasing VVG faith NN from IN the DT public JJ square NN in IN recent JJ years NNS . SENT Apparently RB , , Nalls NP is VBZ unaware JJ that IN one CD of IN the DT defining VVG characteristics NNS of IN the DT so RB called VVN post NN modern JJ period NN is VBZ the DT rise NN of IN religious JJ fundamentalism NN , , which WDT thrives VVZ and CC preys VVZ upon IN ignorance NN and CC gullibility NN . SENT Nalls NP continues VVZ , , This DT tells VVZ me PP that IN America NP is VBZ reading VVG the DT bible NN more RBR than IN we PP thought VVD . SENT Yet RB , , at IN the DT same JJ time NN , , one PP could MD easily RB and CC more RBR persuasively RB draw VV the DT opposite JJ conclusion NN , , namely RB that IN fewer JJR Americans NNS are VBP actually RB devoting VVG any DT significant JJ amount NN of IN time NN to TO reading NN at IN all DT , , let VV alone RB to TO reading VVG the DT bible NN . SENT Widespread JJ literalism NN is VBZ less RBR a DT demonstration NN of IN faith NN than IN it PP is VBZ proof NN that IN a DT great JJ many JJ US NP citizens NNS are VBP simply RB incapable JJ of IN conducting VVG any DT serious JJ kind NN of IN informed JJ textual JJ criticism NN whatsoever RB . SENT Religionists NNS who WP preach VVP that DT knowledge NN is VBZ literally RB a DT forbidden VVN fruit NN , , and CC seek VV to TO place VV a DT taboo NN upon IN scientific JJ endeavor NN for IN fear NN that IN unregulated JJ curiosity NN would MD disprove VV their PP$ most RBS cherished JJ prejudices NNS pose VVP a DT grave NN and CC gathering NN threat NN to TO all DT human JJ civilization NN . SENT Just RB as IN rabid JJ fundamentalist JJ Christians NNS pour VVP into IN the DT cities NNS in IN search NN of IN the DT weak JJ and CC downtrodden JJ in IN order NN to TO manipulate VV their PP$ fears NNS and CC stifle VV their PP$ desires NNS , , so RB too RB must MD the DT heirs NNS of IN the DT Enlightenment NN , , both DT secular NN and CC otherwise RB , , march NN upon IN the DT backwaters NNS and CC the DT boondocks NNS to TO ensure VV that IN the DT spark NN of IN reason NN is VBZ not RB completely RB stamped VVN out RP by IN the DT bootheels NNS of IN goose NN stepping VVG religious JJ fanatics NNS . SENT However RB , , what WP alarmist JJ liberals NNS term NN the DT new JJ Great JJ Awakening NN may MD be VB nothing NN more JJR than IN a DT catatonic JJ somnambulism NN which WDT perfectly RB suits VVZ a DT culturally RB exhausted VVN and CC politically RB spent VVD faction NN of IN the DT population NN . SENT If IN you PP were VBD to TO believe VV Jerry NP Falwell NP , , you'd JJ think VVP Christianity NN were VBD in IN dire JJ straights NNS . SENT Every DT scientific JJ advancement NN and CC discovery NN threatens VVZ to TO undermine VV the DT fundamentalist's NNS backward RB world NN view NN . SENT Interestingly RB , , even RB the DT mainstream JJ editorial NN representatives NNS of IN the DT religious JJ right NN have VHP begun VVN to TO realize VV that IN their PP$ old JJ hard JJ line NN ethics NNS is VBZ incompatible JJ with IN new JJ hard JJ line NN capitalism NN . SENT After IN all DT , , we PP cannot NN forget VV that IN these DT are VBP the DT same JJ people NNS for IN whom WP Adam NP Smith's NP invisible JJ hand NN is VBZ nothing NN other JJ than IN the DT right JJ hand NN of IN God NP . SENT Some DT go VVP so RB far RB as IN to TO call VV them PP market NN fundamentalists NNS . SENT For IN the DT likes NN of IN Falwell NP , , every DT independent JJ thought NN , , every DT glimmer NN of IN doubt NN , , every DT inspired JJ speculation NN , , represents VVZ a DT catastrophic JJ hazard NN , , the DT practical JJ refutation NN of IN the DT preferred JJ dogmas NNS . SENT Of IN course NN , , this DT is VBZ the DT right JJ wing's NN schtick NN , , which WDT they PP lifted VVD from IN the DT liberals NNS . SENT Just RB as IN the DT legions NNS of IN nationally RB syndicated VVN conservative JJ ideologues NNS still RB deny VVP that IN they PP are VBP the DT mainstream JJ media NNS , , so RB too RB do VV the DT religious JJ right NN and CC the DT traditionalists NNS decry VV their PP$ own JJ political JJ marginalization NN even RB as IN they PP grab VVP hold VV of IN the DT reigns NNS of IN power NN . SENT Yet RB , , despite IN their PP$ soporatories NNS , , freedom NN from IN religion NN is VBZ not RB anarchy NN . SENT It PP is VBZ sanity NN . SENT link NN posted VVD by IN sanson NP . SENT 7 CD . SENT 25 CD PM NP February NP 19 CD , , 2004 CD Gay NP marriage NN . SENT Fascist JJ or CC anti JJ Oedipal NP . SENT The DT reacto NN cons NNS at IN Front NP Page NP Magazine NP feigned VVD outrage NN this DT week NN when WRB they PP finally RB got VVD around RP to TO commenting VVG upon IN the DT protests NNS sparked VVN by IN Daniel NP Pipes NP visit NN to TO UC NP Berkeley NP last JJ week NN . SENT The DT lead JJ article NN was VBD entitled VVN Fascism NN at IN UC NP Berkeley NP . SENT Though IN the DT editorial JJ staff NN at IN Front NP Page NP lovingly RB refers VVZ to TO the DT liberal JJ left NN in IN the DT San NP Francisco NP Bay NP Area NP as IN brown JJ shirts NNS , , it PP is VBZ none NN other JJ than IN right JJ wing NN Christian JJ fanatics NNS who WP are VBP demanding VVG that IN the DT Governor NP of IN California NP send VVP in IN the DT storm NN troopers NNS to TO arrest VV the DT thugs NNS who WP have VHP allowed VVN same JJ sex NN couples NNS to TO marry VV in IN San NP Francisco NP . SENT Gavin NP Newsom NP should MD be VB applauded VVD for IN upping VVG the DT ante NN on IN the DT issue NN of IN gay JJ marriage NN . SENT Conservatives NNS have VHP been VBN pushed VVN into IN a DT corner NN by IN one CD liberal JJ mayor NN who WP had VHD something NN to TO prove VV , , and CC soon RB they PP will MD be VB screaming VVG that IN they PP will MD not RB let VV the DT soul NN of IN the DT nation NN be VB held VVN hostage NN by IN left VVN coast NN activists NNS . SENT Indeed RB , , they PP already RB are VBP . SENT This DT article NN by IN Brian NP Fahling NP is VBZ an DT apt JJ specimen NN since IN his PP$ organization NN , , the DT American NP Family NP Association NP Center NP for IN Law NP and CC Policy NP , , is VBZ the DT one NN demanding VVG that DT Schwarzeneggar NP have VH Newsom NP arrested VVN . SENT Fahling's NP hyperbolic JJ thesis NN is VBZ that IN the DT legalization NN of IN gay JJ marriage NN would MD require VV that IN we PP first RB rewrite VV the DT laws NNS of IN nature NN . SENT He PP asserts VVZ that IN the DT physio NN mystical JJ union NN of IN one CD male NN with IN one CD female NN is VBZ the DT essence NN of IN marriage NN , , and CC concludes VVZ that IN since IN allowing VVG gays NNS to TO marry VV would MD alter VV the DT definition NN of IN of IN marriage NN , , gay JJ marriage NN is VBZ effectively RB an DT attack NN upon IN the DT institution NN in IN particular JJ and CC civilization NN in IN general NN . SENT For IN more JJR moderate JJ conservatives NNS , , gay JJ marriage NN is VBZ first JJ and CC foremost RB a DT crime NN against IN language NN . SENT In IN defense NN of IN his PP$ position NN , , he PP argues VVZ that DT heterosexual JJ marriage NN is VBZ the DT foundation NN of IN civilization NN , , underpinned VVN both CC biologically RB male JJ female JJ coupling NN is VBZ necessary JJ for IN the DT perpetuation NN of IN the DT species NN and CC psychologically RB since IN it PP is VBZ the DT basis NN of IN family NN . SENT As IN such JJ , , states VVZ Fahling NP , , marriage NN is VBZ constitutive JJ of IN human JJ dignity NN because IN it PP reflects VVZ an DT order NN that WDT transcends VVZ the DT individual NN , , and CC it PP must MD therefore RB be VB protected VVN by IN constitutional JJ amendment NN . SENT Clearly RB , , in IN the DT normal JJ order NN of IN things NNS , , if IN men NNS and CC women NNS didn't VVD copulate VV the DT species NN would MD soon RB die VV out RP . SENT Male JJ female JJ union NN is VBZ therefore RB necessary JJ to TO perpetuate VV the DT race NN . SENT But CC this DT is VBZ nothing NN other JJ than IN brute JJ biological JJ necessity NN , , and CC does VVZ not RB fundamentally RB distinguish VV humans NNS from IN any DT other JJ species NN which WDT perpetuates VVZ itself PP via IN sexual JJ reproduction NN . SENT To TO claim VV that DT sexual JJ reproduction NN , , under IN the DT rubric NN of IN marriage NN , , is VBZ the DT foundation NN of IN civilization NN , , as IN Fahling NP does VVZ , , is VBZ therefore RB naive JJ at IN best JJS and CC reductive JJ at IN worst JJS . SENT Unlike IN today's NP paleo NP conservatives NNS , , the DT classical JJ political JJ philosophers NNS , , from IN Locke NP to TO Rousseau NP , , were VBD for IN the DT most JJS part NN of IN the DT opinion NN that IN civil JJ political JJ society NN , , i NP . SENT e SYM . SENT civilization NN , , begins VVZ not RB with IN heterosexual JJ union NN i NP . SENT e SYM . SENT conjugal JJ society NN , , but CC rather RB with IN the DT formation NN of IN unions NNS and CC partnerships NNS among IN men NNS , , to TO guard VV collectively RB against IN what WP none NN could MD haved JJ repelled VVN on IN his PP$ own JJ , , and CC to TO secure VV for IN themselves PP as IN a DT group NN what WP no DT individual NN could MD have VH secured VVN alone RB . SENT Nevertheless RB , , to TO save VV marriage NN from IN the DT vulgarities NNS of IN our PP$ biology NN , , Fahling NP deduces VVZ what WP he PP calls VVZ normative JJ family NN structure NN by IN simply RB eternalizing VVG an DT already RB idealized VVN nuclear JJ family NN . SENT Fahling NP apparently RB requires VVZ a DT mystical JJ justification NN for IN his PP$ oedipalism NN . SENT And CC the DT question NN remains VVZ as RB to TO whether IN the DT transcendence NN of IN the DT individual NN in IN marriage NN and CC family NN renders VVZ the DT individual's JJ sex NN and CC gender VV irrelevant JJ . SENT To TO have VH done VVN with IN Fahring NP it PP is VBZ enough JJ to TO recall VV Anti JJ Oedipus NP . SENT sexuality NN is VBZ not RB in IN the DT service NN of IN reproduction NN , , rather RB reproduction NN is VBZ in IN the DT service NN of IN sexuality NN . SENT link NN posted VVD by IN sanson NP . SENT 3 LS . SENT 10 CD AM NP February NP 17 CD , , 2004 CD Update NN . SENT ask VV and CC ye NP shall MD receive VV Just RB three CD days NNS ago RB , , in IN a DT post NN on IN Dobbs NP and CC Glassman's NP recent JJ exchange NN , , I PP wondered VVD how WRB the DT CNN NP anchor NN would MD respond VV to TO hard JJ criticism NN from IN the DT left NN . SENT Yesterday NN , , Dobbs NP invited VVD Peter NP Hart NP , , the DT director NN of IN FAIR JJ , , to TO discuss VV a DT report NN Hart NP recently RB published VVD that DT was VBD critical JJ of IN Dobbs NP program NN . SENT Granted JJ , , FAIR JJ is VBZ not RB exactly RB hard RB left VVN unless IN , , that WDT is VBZ , , you're NNS looking VVG at IN them PP from IN the DT far RB right JJ , , but CC they PP undoubtedly RB lean VVP left VVN of IN center NN on IN most JJS issues NNS . SENT In IN this DT instance NN , , however RB , , something NN may MD not RB be VB better JJR than IN nothing NN . SENT The DT transcript NN of IN the DT interview NN can MD be VB read VVN here RB scroll VV down RB three CD quarters NNS of IN the DT way NN . SENT In IN his PP$ report NN , , Hart NP argues VVZ that IN Dobbs NP is VBZ both CC a DT sensationalist NN and CC an DT alarmist NN , , and CC that IN the DT program NN is VBZ biased VVN toward IN the DT positions NNS its PP$ anchor NN takes VVZ on IN the DT issues NNS of IN immigration NN and CC border NN control NN . SENT The DT question NN remains VVZ , , however RB , , whether IN Hart's NP report NN gets VVZ boyond NN typically RB liberal JJ PC NN speech NN policing VVG . SENT In IN the DT interview NN , , Hart NP only RB alludes VVZ to TO the DT scapegoating VVG of IN illegal JJ workers NNS on IN Dobbs NP program NN , , while IN he PP points VVZ out IN Dobbs NP disdain NN for IN the DT niceties NNS of IN PC NN language NN in IN his PP$ report NN . SENT While IN FAIR JJ should MD be VB applauded VVD for IN its PP$ efforts NNS to TO ferret VV out RP conservative JJ journalistic JJ bias NN , , it PP must MD be VB faulted VVN for IN letting VVG the DT major JJ target NN of IN its PP$ criticism NN FOX NN News NNS determine VVP the DT parameters NNS of IN what WP counts VVZ as IN fair JJ reporting NN . SENT Hart NP begins VVZ his PP$ report NN with IN a DT reference NN to TO FOX NN . SENT With IN all PDT the DT attention NN paid VVD to TO the DT near JJ overt JJ partisanship NN of IN the DT Fox NP News NP Channel NP , , it's NNS important JJ to TO remember VV that DT skewed JJ reporting NN wasn't NN invented VVD by IN Rupert NP Murdoch's NP cable NN operation NN . SENT It PP is VBZ well RB known VVN that DT FOX NN considers VVZ a DT segment NN fair JJ and CC balanced JJ if IN and CC only RB if IN a DT conservative JJ host NN moderates NNS a DT discussion NN between IN a DT mainstream JJ liberal NN and CC a DT mainstream JJ conservative NN . SENT Hart's NP fundamental JJ gripe NN with IN Dobbs NP is VBZ that IN he PP does VVZ not RB live VV up RP to TO this DT journalistic JJ standard NN , , and CC thereby RB skews VVZ his PP$ discussions NNS toward IN the DT positions NNS of IN anti JJ immigrationists NNS . SENT Hart's NP method NN does VVZ not RB serve VV him PP well RB . SENT He PP alleges VVZ that IN Dobbs NP wants VVZ viewers NNS to TO think VV the DT country NN is VBZ in IN a DT state NN of IN crisis NN , , but CC Dobbs NP freely RB admits VVZ that IN the DT country NN is VBZ in IN a DT state NN of IN crisis NN and CC the DT criticism NN is VBZ deflected VVD . SENT A DT more RBR effective JJ critique NN would MD analyze VV Dobbs NP language NN and CC rhetoric NN to TO show VV that IN the DT anchor's JJ obsession NN with IN illegal JJ immigration NN and CC border NN control NN is VBZ irrational JJ and CC blows NNS the DT perceived VVN problem NN out RP of IN all DT reasonable JJ proportion NN . SENT link NN posted VVD by IN sanson NP . SENT 12 CD . SENT 04 CD AM NP February NP 16 CD , , 2004 CD Duopoly NN politics NNS , , or CC , , sign VV right RB here RB Mr NP . SENT Faust NN By IN the DT day NN it PP grows VVZ increasingly RB clear VV just RB how WRB similar JJ the DT two CD duopoly NN parties NNS are VBP in IN terms NNS of IN strategy NN , , tactics NNS , , and CC political JJ practice NN . SENT It PP is VBZ therefore RB no DT coincidence NN that IN political JJ operatives NNS , , both CC conservative JJ and CC liberal JJ , , are VBP struggling VVG all PDT the DT more RBR to TO delineate VV the DT differences NNS between IN the DT two CD parties NNS in IN terms NNS of IN ideology NN and CC world NN view NN . SENT Today NN each DT of IN the DT ruling NN factions NNS is VBZ being VBG assailed VVN from IN both CC the DT left NN and CC the DT right NN though IN the DT Democrats NPS are VBP getting VVG a DT pass NN from IN many JJ progressive JJ quarters NNS this DT time NN around RB . SENT The DT two CD parties NNS must MD not RB only RB spar VV with IN one CD another DT , , they PP must MD also RB keep VV the DT flock NN in IN formation NN , , hook VV the DT non JJ aligned VVN , , and CC exploit VV the DT independently RB organized VVN just RB to TO keep VV themselves PP afloat RB . SENT On IN the DT issue NN of IN duopoly NN politics NNS and CC the DT two CD party NN system NN anarchists NNS , , moderates NNS and CC independents NNS not RB to TO mention VV third JJ parties NNS have VHP much RB common JJ ground NN , , and CC could MD mount VV a DT strong JJ front NN against IN the DT liberal JJ conservative JJ republicratic JJ order NN . SENT This DT does VVZ not RB go VV unnoticed JJ by IN the DT establishment NN . SENT Just RB as IN the DT elite JJ media NN television NN and CC print NN fear VVP the DT rise NN of IN alternative JJ news NN sources NNS , , so RB too RB do VV Democratic JJ and CC Republican JJ party NN elites NNS fear VVP the DT rise NN of IN viable JJ political JJ alternatives NNS to TO the DT ruling NN order NN . SENT Every DT year NN more JJR people NNS realize VVP that IN a DT vote NN for IN a DT Republican NP or CC a DT Democrat NP is VBZ a DT vote NN for IN the DT political JJ system NN in IN which WDT effective JJ choice NN is VBZ confined VVN to TO a DT virtual JJ coin NN toss VV between IN a DT Republican NP and CC a DT Democrat NP . SENT And CC this DT because IN so RB many JJ people NNS cast VVD their PP$ votes NNS not RB in IN favor NN of IN some DT candidate NN but CC rather RB against IN that DT candidate's JJ opponent NN . SENT The DT two CD party NN system NN is VBZ a DT fundamental JJ pillar NN of IN the DT political JJ status FW quo FW , , spawning VVG , , contributing VVG to TO and CC exascerbating VVG various JJ social JJ , , political JJ and CC economic JJ injustices NNS . SENT Many JJ party NN loyalists NNS cannot NN admit VVP this DT , , for IN obvious JJ reasons NNS , , and CC prefer VVP instead RB to TO blame VV each DT other JJ for IN what WP are VBP actually RB structural JJ effects NNS of IN the DT binary JJ system NN . SENT Few JJ defenses NNS of IN the DT duopoly NN are VBP therefore RB especially RB persuasive JJ , , when WRB you PP hear VVP them PP . SENT At IN Change NP for IN America NP , , for IN instance NN , , it PP has VHZ been VBN argued VVN that IN , , it PP is VBZ not RB in IN my PP$ view NN the DT two CD party NN system NN which WDT has VHZ failed VVN us PP , , where WRB us PP refers VVZ to TO Howard NP Dean's NP supporters NNS . SENT The DT claim NN responds VVZ to TO the DT inkling NN that IN disgruntled JJ Deaniacs NP may MD wander VV off RP from IN the DT Democratic JJ herd NN . SENT The DT piece NN therefore RB aims VVZ to TO bring VV people NNS back RB into IN the DT bipartisan JJ fold VV , , but CC even RB the DT author NN does VVZ not RB seem VV fully RB convinced JJ of IN his PP$ own JJ position NN . SENT Trippi NP draws VVZ a DT productive JJ distinction NN between IN transactional JJ and CC transformational JJ politics NNS which WDT differentiates VVZ political JJ backscratching NN from IN political JJ empowerment NN , , respectively RB and CC with IN the DT obvious JJ valuation NN and CC asserts VVZ that IN the DT media NNS are VBP part NN of IN the DT problem NN . SENT The DT press NN praises VVZ a DT transactional JJ position NN taken VVN by IN a DT candidate NN as IN politically RB smart JJ . SENT This DT , , however RB , , may MD be VB too RB charitable JJ a DT reading NN of IN the DT mass JJ press NN . SENT The DT media NNS are VBP reductive JJ . SENT Simply RB put VVN , , they PP view VVP transactionalism NN as IN politics NNS tout VV court NN . SENT The DT argument NN continues VVZ . SENT The DT two CD party NN system NN has VHZ not RB failed VVN us PP . SENT What WP is VBZ wrong JJ today NN is VBZ not RB Democratic JJ Party NP vs NP Republican NP Party NP . SENT It PP is VBZ not RB even RB the DT old JJ there RB isn't JJ a DT dimes NNS bit NN of IN difference NN between IN them PP meme NN . SENT No RB it PP is VBZ a DT system NN that WDT pits VVZ a DT transactional JJ leader NN produced VVN by IN the DT Republican NP Party NP against IN a DT transactional JJ leader NN produced VVN by IN the DT Democratic JJ Party NP . SENT Is VBZ it PP not RB the DT case NN , , however RB , , that IN the DT latter NN is VBZ constitutive JJ of IN the DT two CD party NN system NN . SENT If IN so RB , , then RB it PP would MD seem VV that IN the DT two CD party NN system NN must MD fail VV us PP if IN our PP$ goal NN is VBZ a DT transformational JJ politics NNS . SENT In IN other JJ words NNS , , why WRB agree VVP with IN the DT duopoly NN partys NN apologists NNS when WRB they PP argue VVP that IN the DT two CD party NN system NN isn't VVD the DT probelm NN , , but CC rather RB that IN the DT two CD party NN system NN is VBZ . SENT We PP shouldn't VVD fail VV to TO note VV the DT transaction NN which WDT is VBZ lurking VVG here RB below IN the DT surface NN . SENT if IN you PP want VVP transformational JJ leadership NN vote NN Democrat NP because IN you'll NN at IN least JJS experience VV the DT transformation NN from IN one CD transactionalism NN to TO another DT . SENT This DT , , of IN couse NP , , is VBZ the DT old JJ lesser JJR of IN two CD evils NNS argument NN with IN a DT hat NN on IN . SENT The DT two CD party NN system NN thrives VVZ on IN artifice NN and CC political JJ blackmail NN . SENT link NN posted VVD by IN sanson NP . SENT 12 CD . SENT 25 CD AM NP February NP 15 CD , , 2004 CD Kill NP your PP$ television NN Last JJ week NN , , in IN a DT post NN entitled VVD The DT American NP Taliban NP , , it PP was VBD fantasized VVN that IN one CD day NN conservatives NNS would MD finally RB grow VV tired JJ of IN their PP$ crusade NN to TO clean VV up RP television NN programming NN , , and CC decide VVP to TO clean VV house NN instead RB by IN throwing VVG away RP their PP$ televisions NNS or CC perhaps RB even RB hanging VVG them PP from IN the DT trees NNS as IN the DT Taliban NP once RB did VVD . SENT It PP is VBZ a DT pleasant JJ surprise NN to TO see VV that DT conservative JJ youth NN have VHP heard VVN the DT call NN . SENT Kyle NP Williams NP now RB advises VVZ his PP$ readers NNS to TO toss VV out RP their PP$ televisions NNS . SENT Of IN course NN , , in IN this DT , , conservatives NNS are VBP behind IN the DT curve NN , , but CC , , as IN they PP say VVP , , better RBR late JJ than IN never RB . SENT Left VVN wing NN media NNS activists NNS have VHP been VBN wantonly RB smashing VVG televisions NNS in IN principled JJ acts NNS of IN destructive JJ consumerism NN for IN well RB over IN a DT year NN . SENT The DT question NN now RB is VBZ who WP will MD be VB the DT first JJ to TO storm NN into IN and CC occupy VV the DT studios NNS of IN a DT major JJ television NN network NN . SENT This DT most RBS interesting JJ facet NN of IN this DT confluence NN of IN interests NNS and CC demands NNS on IN the DT issue NN of IN the DT media NNS from IN the DT far RB left VVN and CC the DT far JJ right NN is VBZ that IN each DT group NN believes VVZ the DT media NNS are VBP biased VVN in IN the DT direction NN of IN the DT other's JJ position NN . SENT The DT right JJ wing NN is VBZ sickened VVN that IN the DT media NNS glorify VV liberal JJ secularism NN and CC its PP$ loose JJ morals NNS , , while IN the DT left NN are VBP fed VVN up RP with IN television's JJ prudish JJ conservatism NN and CC political JJ naivety NN . SENT These DT conflicting JJ claims NNS raise VVP a DT number NN of IN questions NNS . SENT Will MD groups NNS on IN the DT left VVN and CC right RB realize VV that IN it PP is VBZ in IN their PP$ mutual JJ interests NNS to TO form VV grassroots NNS alliances NNS across IN traditional JJ partisan JJ boundaries NNS in IN order NN to TO wage VV a DT more RBR effective JJ war NN against IN the DT national JJ media NNS . SENT Or CC will NN partisanship NN prevent VV them PP from IN recognizing VVG what WP is VBZ in IN their PP$ own JJ best JJS interests NNS . SENT Could MD it PP be VB that IN the DT standard JJ forms NNS of IN media NNS criticism NN on IN the DT left VVN and CC right RB prevent VV these DT groups NNS from IN recognizing VVG their PP$ implicit JJ affiliation NN . SENT If IN the DT media NNS alienate VV and CC offend VV both DT conservatives NNS and CC liberals NNS , , as IN they PP clearly RB do VVP , , is VBZ this DT not RB evidence NN that IN they PP are VBP in IN some DT sense NN non JJ partisan JJ . SENT Television NN content NN only RB alienates VVZ factions NNS of IN the DT television NN viewing NN audience NN . SENT Whatever WDT the DT program NN , , some DT will MD say VV tune NN in IN and CC others NNS will MD say VV turn VV it PP off RP . SENT Demographically RB targeted VVN television NN advertising NN demonstrates VVZ that DT television NN programming NN lives VVZ parasitically RB off RB of IN the DT fragmentation NN of IN the DT public NN . SENT Balkin NP has VHZ effectively RB shown VVN that IN the DT apologists NNS of IN the DT traditional JJ media NN project NN fear NN of IN this DT actual JJ fragmentation NN upon IN new JJ media NNS forms NNS which WDT in IN fact NN subvert VV it PP . SENT The DT form NN of IN television NN , , on IN the DT other JJ hand NN , , alienates VVZ without IN regard NN to TO partisan JJ proclivities NNS . SENT It PP need VVP not RB even RB be VB turned VVN on IN to TO achieve VV this DT effect NN . SENT If IN you PP have VHP a DT television NN , , its PP$ presence NN and CC placement NN likely RB dominate VVP entire JJ rooms NNS of IN your PP$ house NN or CC apartment NN . SENT From IN this DT , , it PP seems VVZ obvious JJ that IN simply RB changing VVG the DT channel NN will MD not RB fundamentally RB change VV the DT social JJ order NN which WDT produces VVZ the DT media NNS programming NN you PP dislike VVP . SENT Today NN , , television NN controls VVZ us PP , , we PP do VVP not RB control VV it PP . SENT However RB , , the DT fact NN that IN so RB many JJ groups NNS are VBP now RB working VVG to TO change VV the DT face NN of IN broadcast NN and CC cable NN television NN shows VVZ not RB that IN more JJR people NNS have VHP reocognized VVN the DT importance NN of IN civic JJ involvement NN and CC media NNS reform NN , , but CC rather RB that IN few JJ are VBP willing JJ to TO throw VV away RP their PP$ televisions NNS . SENT We PP haven't VVD given VVN up RP faith NN in IN TV NN just RB yet RB . SENT link NN posted VVD by IN sanson NP . SENT 4 LS . SENT 32 CD PM NP February NP 14 CD , , 2004 CD On IN a DT recent JJ altercation NN between IN a DT neocon NN and CC a DT paleolib NN Lou NP Dobbs NP interview NN this DT week NN with IN James NP Glassman NP of IN the DT AEI NP is VBZ noteworthy JJ for IN a DT number NN of IN reasons NNS , , the DT least JJS among IN them PP that IN Dobbs NP and CC Glassman NP were VBD at IN each DT others NNS throats NNS . SENT Dobbs NP took VVD issue NN with IN an DT article NN Glassman NP wrote VVD , , entitled VVD Exporting NP Lou NP Dobbs NP , , which WDT began VVD . SENT What's NNS gotten VVN into IN Lou NP Dobbs NP . SENT Once RB a DT sensible NN , , if IN self NN important JJ and CC sycophantic JJ , , CNN NP anchor NN , , he PP has VHZ suddenly RB become VVN a DT table NN thumping VVG protectionist NN . SENT Dobbs NP understandably RB had VHD a DT score NN to TO settle VV when WRB he PP invited VVD Glassman NP on IN , , and CC the DT exchange NN is VBZ worth IN a DT read NN , , for IN it PP makes VVZ one PP wonder VVP how WRB the DT anchor NN would MD respond VV to TO hard JJ criticism NN from IN the DT left NN . SENT Even RB though IN he PP is VBZ one CD of IN the DT few JJ cable NN news NN anchors NNS who WP consistently RB stands VVZ up RP for IN the DT interests NNS of IN the DT working VVG class NN , , and CC though IN he PP likely RB admires VVZ Dennis NP Kucinich NP for IN pledging VVG to TO withdraw VV the DT United NP States NPS from IN NAFTA NP and CC the DT WTO NP , , Lou NP Dobbs NP is VBZ reviled VVN by IN many JJ on IN the DT left NN , , and CC not RB without IN reason NN . SENT However RB , , Dobbs NP program NN is VBZ not RB so RB much RB racist JJ and CC ethnocentric JJ as RB recently RB asserted VVD over RP at IN The DT Liquid NP List NP , , as IN it PP is VBZ chauvinistic JJ and CC xenophobic JJ . SENT So RB much RB is VBZ apparent JJ from IN the DT very JJ titles NNS of IN his PP$ three CD running VVG reports NNS . SENT Made VVN in IN America NP , , Exporting NP America NP and CC Broken NP Borders NP . SENT Dobbs NP has VHZ a DT legitimate JJ gripe NN with IN the DT fact NN that IN the DT United NP States NPS exports VVZ legal JJ jobs NNS and CC imports NNS illegal JJ workers NNS , , but CC , , as RB has VHZ been VBN noted VVN here RB before RB , , he PP prefers VVZ to TO blame VV immigrants NNS and CC foreigners NNS for IN the DT decisions NNS made VVN by IN US NP policy NN elites NNS , , and CC desires NNS to TO paper NN over IN the DT structural JJ flaws NNS of IN American JJ capitalism NN with IN border NN control NN . SENT Oliver NP at IN TLL NP elaborates VVZ what WP are VBP likely RB the DT feelings NNS of IN a DT great JJ many JJ people NNS on IN this DT precise JJ issue NN . SENT However RB , , so RB called VVN economic JJ patriotism NN could MD be VB a DT powerful JJ tool NN for IN the DT left NN , , a DT rhetorical JJ conduit NN into IN the DT fragile JJ minds NNS of IN mainstream JJ conservatives NNS . SENT Which WDT brings VVZ us PP back RB to TO Glassman NP . SENT Oliver NP refers VVZ to TO Glassman NP as IN the DT wackjob NN from IN the DT AEI NP . SENT The DT epithet NN is VBZ apt JJ , , but CC we PP should MD recognize VV that IN Glassman NP is VBZ quite RB mainstream JJ , , as IN his PP$ rap NN sheet NN shows NNS . SENT His PP$ record NN testifies VVZ to TO the DT incestuousness NN of IN the DT media NNS industry NN and CC the DT right JJ wing NN fifth JJ column NN which WDT has VHZ grown VVN up RP inside IN it PP . SENT The DT question NN remains VVZ as IN to TO why WRB he PP was VBD so RB hard JJ on IN Lou NP , , after IN all DT , , they PP were VBD on IN a DT first JJ name NN basis NN . SENT Given VVN that IN he PP refers VVZ to TO Paul NP O'Neill NP as IN an DT inept JJ screwball NN . SENT . SENT . SENT treacherous JJ and CC vindictive JJ , , and CC advocates NNS that IN Canada NP liberate VV its PP$ health NN care NN system NN , , he PP probably RB cannot VV not RB see VV Dobbs NP as IN a DT table NN thumping VVG protectionist NN . SENT But CC why WRB right RB now RB . SENT Let's NNS wager VV an DT explanation NN . SENT Two CD weeks NNS ago IN Glassman NP , , a DT cynical JJ free JJ market NN fanatic JJ , , wrote VVD an DT article NN entitled VVD Three CD Mysteries NNS of IN Iraq NP in IN which WDT he PP pronounced VVD the DT truth NN about IN the DT emperor's NNS new JJ clothes NNS . SENT He PP explains VVZ that IN Bush NP was VBD not RB only RB fooled VVN by IN his PP$ intelligence NN handlers NNS before IN the DT war NN , , but CC also RB that IN he PP is VBZ being VBG fooled VVN by IN those DT who WP argue VVP that DT things NNS are VBP going VVG just RB fine JJ , , and CC everything's NNS unfolding VVG according VVG to TO plan VV now RB in IN the DT post NN war NN . SENT As IN a DT solution NN to TO the DT problem NN , , Glassman NP proposes VVZ finding VVG an DT appropriate JJ scapegoat NN somewhere RB in IN the DT intelligence NN bureaucracy NN . SENT Is VBZ it PP not RB delectable JJ that IN right JJ wing NN anti NN Stalinists NP always RB secretly RB desire VVP show NN trials NNS . SENT Glassman NP must MD have VH recieved VVN a DT deluge NN of IN negative JJ email NP and CC comment VV from IN his PP$ readers NNS and CC colleagues NNS . SENT Not RB only RB did VVD he PP admit VVP the DT opposite NN of IN the DT approved VVN right NN wing NN conservative JJ Republican JJ war NN narrative NN , , but CC he PP openly RB discussed VVD political JJ strategy NN , , which WDT is VBZ taboo JJ in IN many JJ of IN his PP$ circles NNS . SENT Glassman NP knew VVD as IN much RB , , he PP states VVZ , , my PP$ friends NNS on IN the DT right NN are VBP probably RB screaming VVG . SENT The DT suspicion NN here RB is VBZ that IN he PP got VVD more JJR than IN he PP bargained VVD for IN . SENT A DT week NN passed VVD but CC the DT response NN kept VVD pouring VVG in IN . SENT For IN the DT AEI NP , , Glassman NP writes VVZ a DT few JJ articles NNS a DT week NN , , sometimes RB only RB one CD , , and CC he PP rarely RB publishes VVZ more JJR than IN one CD article NN on IN the DT same JJ day NN . SENT In IN the DT last JJ six CD months NNS he PP has VHZ done VVN the DT latter NN on IN two CD occasions NNS . SENT On IN one CD he PP attacks VVZ George NP Soros NP , , on IN the DT other JJ he PP attacks VVZ Dobbs NP . SENT The DT former JJ occurs VVZ two CD weeks NNS after IN praising VVG one CD of IN the DT President's NP many JJ spending NN policies NNS in IN action NN , , the DT latter JJ two CD weeks NNS after IN admiting VVG the DT obvious JJ concerning VVG the DT issue NN of IN Iraq NP . SENT This DT demonstrates VVZ one CD of IN the DT simplest JJS operations NNS of IN the DT herd NN mentality NN prevalent JJ among IN the DT amateur JJ intellectuals NNS who WP populate VV the DT news NN columns NNS and CC think VV tanks NNS . SENT individuals NNS who WP transgress VV the DT herd's NNS ideological JJ code NN realign VV themselves PP , , through IN a DT kind NN of IN ideological JJ penance NN , , by IN maligning VVG the DT herd's NNS avowed VVD opponents NNS . SENT To TO have VH no DT principles NNS , , and CC to TO be VB able JJ to TO defend VV them PP , , that WDT makes VVZ the DT ideologue NN . SENT link NN posted VVD by IN sanson NP . SENT 1 LS . SENT 14 CD AM NP February NP 12 CD , , 2004 CD Love NN your PP$ government NN as IN yourself PP As IN the DT framers NNS of IN the DT US NP constitution NN well RB knew VVD , , government NN is VBZ the DT single JJ greatest JJS threat NN to TO human JJ liberty NN on IN earth NN . SENT Politicians NNS , , however RB , , are VBP mostly RB of IN the DT opinion NN that IN only RB their PP$ opponents NNS represent VVP such PDT a DT threat NN . SENT Similarly RB with IN ideologues NNS . SENT George NP W NP . SENT Bush NP , , on IN the DT other JJ hand NN , , thinks VVZ government NN is VBZ a DT force NN for IN good JJ . SENT Indeed RB , , both DT liberals NNS and CC conservatives NNS believe VVP that DT government NN would MD be VB a DT force NN for IN good JJ if IN only RB they PP were VBD in IN control NN of IN it PP . SENT This DT is VBZ an DT illusion NN of IN power NN . SENT Nonetheless RB , , the DT mainstream NN for IN the DT most JJS part NN agree VVP with IN the DT President NP when WRB he PP asserts VVZ that IN the DT expansion NN of IN government NN is VBZ good JJ when WRB it PP enhances VVZ security NN , , though IN many JJ may MD oppose VV the DT precise JJ fashion NN in IN which WDT his PP$ administration NN has VHZ expanded VVN it PP . SENT Everyone NN should MD therefore RB read VV James NP Bovard's NP analysis NN of IN the DT still RB expanding VVG Transportation NP Security NP Administration NP . SENT Though IN it PP may MD be VB a DT monster NN , , the DT TSA NP cannot NN expand VV at IN will NN . SENT For IN instance NN , , the DT bureaucrat NN charged VVN with IN overseeing VVG the DT production NN of IN the DT CAPPS NP II NP airline NN passenger NN screening NN system NN recently RB resigned VVD amid IN growing VVG criticism NN of IN the DT project NN . SENT Gods NNS help VVP us PP when WRB the DT vanity NN of IN our PP$ officials NNS is VBZ the DT last JJ line NN of IN defense NN against IN government NN creep VV . SENT Details NNS about IN the DT GAO's NP report NN on IN CAPPS NP II NP are VBP already RB leaking VVG into IN the DT press NN , , though IN they PP are VBP getting VVG scant JJ attention NN in IN the DT main JJ . SENT The DT LA NP Times NP story NN is VBZ in IN the DT technology NN section NN . SENT USA NP Today NP relegates VVZ its PP$ coverage NN to TO travel VV . SENT CAPPS NP II NP , , as IN you're NN likely RB aware JJ , , would MD label VV every DT airline NN passenger NN with IN a DT color NN coding VVG to TO represent VV the DT level NN of IN threat NN they PP pose VVP , , based VVN upon IN variously RB collected VVN personal JJ files NNS and CC records NNS , , all RB on IN the DT assumption NN that IN this DT will MD help VV sift VV out RP the DT terrorists NNS from IN the DT masses NNS . SENT It PP is VBZ a DT cross NN between IN the DT Department NP of IN Homeland NN Security's NP terrorism NN Advisory NP System NP , , the DT stop NN light NN , , and CC a DT totalitarian JJ nightmare NN . SENT Are VBP you PP green JJ , , yellow JJ or CC red JJ . SENT CAPPS NP II NP is VBZ here RB to TO remind VV us PP that IN society NN is VBZ a DT prison NN . SENT The DT security NN checkpoint NN is VBZ a DT gate NN in IN the DT panopticon NN . SENT CAPPS NP II NP is VBZ its PP$ modernization NN . SENT Perhaps RB we PP the DT people NNS should MD devise VV a DT civic JJ advisory JJ system NN to TO represent VV the DT level NN of IN threat NN posed VVN by IN our PP$ government's JJ apparatus NN and CC its PP$ advocates NNS . SENT Red JJ alert NN , , Congress NP is VBZ in IN session NN . SENT Will MD the DT middle JJ class NN simply RB give VV up RP its PP$ rights NNS as IN the DT French JJ aristocracy NN did VVD its PP$ privileges NNS . SENT Some DT are VBP prepared VVN to TO do VV so RB on IN condition NN that IN our PP$ elected JJ officials NNS suffer VVP the DT same JJ indignity NN . SENT The DT situation NN has VHZ become VVN so RB acute JJ that IN some DT even RB willingly RB embrace VV totalitarian JJ controls NNS just RB to TO ensure VV scrutiny NN of IN government NN . SENT This DT is VBZ the DT thrust NN , , for IN example NN , , of IN Rupert NP Goodwins NP critique NN of IN Charlie NP Stross's NP The DT Panopticon NP Singularity NN , , which WDT is VBZ a DT survey NN of IN the DT technologies NNS constitutive JJ of IN what WP has VHZ come VVN to TO be VB called VVN the DT surveillance NN society NN . SENT Not RB surprisingly RB Goodwins NP capitulation NN is VBZ based VVN on IN a DT misconception NN of IN Bentham's NP ideal JJ panopticon NN . SENT He PP writes VVZ , , In IN Bentham's NP vitreous JJ world NN , , the DT prison NN guards NNS are VBP exempted VVN from IN the DT regime NN of IN universal JJ observation NN . SENT in IN Stross NP singularity NN , , they're NN part NN of IN the DT herd NN . SENT Thus RB Goodwins NP cheer NN in IN the DT face NN of IN Stross NP thesis NN . SENT However RB , , he PP should MD reread VV his PP$ Bentham NP . SENT There EX are VBP no DT prison NN guards VVZ in IN the DT panopticon NN . SENT People NNS are VBP induced VVN to TO censor VV and CC restrain VV themselves PP by IN being VBG led VVN to TO believe VV that IN they PP are VBP always RB under IN inspection NN . SENT Bentham NP writes VVZ . SENT Ideal JJ perfection NN , , if IN that WDT were VBD the DT object NN , , would MD require VV that IN each DT person NN should MD actually RB be VB in IN that DT predicament NN i NP . SENT e SYM . SENT being NN under IN surveillance NN , , during IN every DT instant NN of IN time NN . SENT This DT being VBG impossible JJ , , the DT next JJ thing NN to TO be VB wished VVN for IN is VBZ , , that WDT , , at IN every DT instant NN , , seeing VVG reason NN to TO believe VV as RB much JJ , , and CC not RB being VBG able JJ to TO satisfy VV himself PP to TO the DT contrary NN , , he PP should MD conceive VV himself PP to TO be VB so IN i NP . SENT e SYM . SENT under IN surveillance NN . SENT In IN other JJ words NNS , , the DT panopticon NN functions NNS not RB by IN a DT literal JJ regime NN of IN permanent JJ observation NN , , but CC by IN architecturally RB inducing VVG the DT illusion NN that IN you PP are VBP always RB being VBG observed VVN . SENT A DT similar JJ ruse NN is VBZ played VVN on IN the DT public JJ today NN with IN the DT help NN of IN fake JJ security NN cameras NNS and CC television NN talk NN shows NNS . SENT In IN this DT way NN too RB , , government NN smothers NNS liberty NN with IN the DT illusion NN of IN security NN . SENT link NN posted VVD by IN sanson NP . SENT 7 CD . SENT 13 CD AM NP February NP 11 CD , , 2004 CD Robots NNS to TO replace VV newscasters NNS Just RB as RB in IN almost RB every DT other JJ conceivable JJ profession NN , , mediocrity NN is VBZ the DT rule NN and CC norm NN in IN journalism NN today NN . SENT So RB it PP is VBZ not RB surprising JJ that IN our PP$ national JJ media NNS do VVP little RB more RBR than IN propagate VV rumors NNS and CC myth NN , , obfuscate VV historical JJ context NN , , and CC generally RB contribute VV to TO the DT overall JJ social JJ decay NN obvious JJ in IN our PP$ civic JJ environment NN . SENT If IN they PP sometimes RB even RB speed VV that DT deterioration NN , , so RB much RB the DT better RBR . SENT Paraphrasing VVG Tenet NN , , the DT news NN , , like IN our PP$ intelligence NN , , is VBZ almost RB never RB completely RB right RB and CC often RB completely RB wrong JJ . SENT Otherwise RB media NNS criticism NN would MD not RB be VB as RB prevalent JJ as IN it PP is VBZ . SENT However RB , , since IN mainstream NN media NNS criticism NN is VBZ for IN the DT most JJS part NN conducted VVN by IN journalists NNS it PP suffers VVZ from IN their PP$ limitations NNS , , which WDT are VBP also RB the DT limitations NNS of IN mainstream JJ discourse NN . SENT This DT piece NN by IN Bob NP Garfield NP is VBZ hardly RB better JJR than IN most JJS , , which WDT is VBZ more JJR than IN one CD would MD otherwise RB expect VV . SENT Garfield NP pays VVZ homage NN to TO the DT myth NN of IN desensitization NN , , and CC pulls VVZ out RP the DT laundry NN list NN of IN bipartisan JJ gripes NNS with IN the DT corporate JJ news NN media NNS . SENT they PP are VBP repetitive JJ and CC patronizing JJ , , they PP glorify VV violence NN , , they PP border NN upon IN the DT pornographic JJ etc NN . SENT However RB , , he PP adds VVZ what WP he PP calls VVZ a DT relatively RB new JJ phenomenon NN , , which WDT he PP calls VVZ logo NN tization NN . SENT This DT is VBZ not RB the DT logo NN of IN the DT Greek JJ logos NNS . SENT It PP refers VVZ rather RB to TO the DT corporate JJ insignia NN . SENT This DT terminology NN , , dictated VVN by IN the DT discursive JJ machinery NN of IN the DT corporate JJ media NNS Garfield NP is VBZ a DT columnist NN for IN Advertising NP Age NP , , is VBZ unfortunate JJ , , but CC then RB again RB so RB is VBZ the DT wording NN of IN its PP$ definition NN . SENT Logo NN tization NN , , says VVZ Garfield NP , , occurs VVZ when WRB a DT journalistic JJ image NN ceases VVZ to TO tell VV a DT story NN but CC becomes VVZ a DT symbol NN for IN a DT story NN , , denuding VVG it PP both DT of IN its PP$ actual JJ news NN significance NN and CC of IN its PP$ inherent JJ drama NN . SENT His PP$ examples NNS are VBP the DT Dean NP scream NN , , Janet's NP breast NN and CC the DT security NN camera NN footage NN of IN a DT girl's JJ abduction NN in IN Florida NP . SENT But CC the DT question NN remains VVZ as RB to TO whether IN any DT of IN these DT clips NNS is VBZ symbolic JJ of IN some DT supposed VVN news NN story NN . SENT What WP are VBP the DT alleged JJ stories NNS . SENT Janet NP Jackson's NP breast NN was VBD seen VVN on IN national JJ television NN . SENT Howard NP Dean NP yelped VVD . SENT A DT little JJ girl NN was VBD abducted VVN . SENT There EX is VBZ no DT sense NN in IN which WDT the DT footage NN of IN these DT events NNS symbolizes VVZ these DT stories NNS . SENT In IN fact NN , , the DT story NN was VBD not RB that IN a DT little JJ was VBD abducted VVN , , but CC rather RB that IN her PP$ abduction NN was VBD caught VVN on IN tape NN . SENT not RB that IN Jackson NP exposed VVD her PP$ breast NN , , but CC rather RB that IN this DT was VBD broadcast VVN on IN television NN . SENT not RB that IN Dean NP raves VVZ , , but CC that IN he PP does VVZ so RB in IN front NN of IN the DT cameras NNS . SENT Indeed RB , , it PP is VBZ questionable JJ whether IN there EX is VBZ any DT import NN to TO these DT alleged JJ stories NNS at IN all DT outside NN of IN the DT fact NN that IN they PP testify VVP to TO the DT omnipresence NN of IN the DT aperture NN . SENT These DT images NNS do VVP not RB symbolize VV and CC denude VV potential JJ news NN stories NNS , , they PP substitute VV for IN actual JJ news NN reporting NN and CC signify VV this DT very JJ lack NN . SENT They PP are VBP media NNS viruses NNS . SENT Nonetheless RB , , Garfield NP smartly RB ties VVZ logotization NN to TO the DT commodification NN of IN images NNS . SENT He PP nostalgically RB longs VVZ for IN the DT good JJ old JJ days NNS , , before IN the DT advent NN of IN the DT twenty CD four CD hour NN news NN cycle NN , , when WRB images NNS were VBD still RB able JJ to TO retain VV an DT aura NN , , when WRB we PP were VBD still RB assured VVN of IN the DT permanence NN of IN history NN . SENT Garfield NP compares VVZ the DT iconic JJ images NNS of IN the DT past NN with IN the DT commodified JJ images NNS of IN the DT present JJ and CC finds VVZ the DT latter NN lacking VVG in IN the DT proper JJ dignity NN of IN the DT historical JJ order NN . SENT They're NP manufactured VVD , , consumed VVN and CC quickly RB replaced VVN . SENT They PP retain VVP no DT monumental JJ aspect NN . SENT What's NNS worse RBR , , and CC what WP Garfield NP wants VVZ not RB to TO admit VV , , is VBZ that IN they PP infect VV the DT archive NP of IN iconic JJ images NNS through IN implicit JJ or CC explicit JJ parody NN . SENT The DT images NNS themselves PP have VHP hardly RB changed VVN , , at IN least JJS in IN terms NNS of IN content NN . SENT The DT Hindenberg NP , , the DT Challenger NP . SENT The DT raising NN of IN the DT flag NN at IN Iwo NP Jima NP , , the DT raising NN of IN the DT flag NN in IN the DT rubble NN of IN the DT World NP Trade NP Center NP . SENT A DT man NN on IN the DT moon NN , , a DT robot NN on IN Mars NP . SENT Etc FW . SENT A DT more RBR important JJ change NN has VHZ taken VVN place NN in IN the DT public's JJ relation NN to TO the DT news NN media NNS . SENT In IN other JJ words NNS , , Garfield NP responds VVZ to TO the DT passing NN of IN the DT illusion NN that IN the DT media NNS especially RB broadcast VVN and CC cable NN television NN news NN media NNS document NN and CC are VBP a DT documentation NN of IN history NN . SENT Who WP today NN tunes NNS into IN FOX NN programming NN to TO find VV out RP what WP happened VVD , , rather RB than IN to TO see VV how WRB certain JJ conservatives NNS are VBP spinning VVG the DT news NN . SENT Who WP believes VVZ the DT New NP York NP Times NP contains VVZ all PDT the DT news NN that's NNS fit VVP to TO print VV . SENT Moreover RB , , the DT dominance NN of IN the DT image NN productively RB renders VVZ certain JJ forms NNS of IN human JJ labor NN superfluous JJ . SENT The DT news NN anchor NN is VBZ an DT anachronism NN within IN the DT context NN of IN the DT new JJ corporate JJ media NNS order NN . SENT These DT people NNS do VVP little RB more RBR than IN tick VV off RP insipid JJ captions NNS to TO extra JJ ordinary JJ images NNS . SENT The DT news NN anchor NN is VBZ superfluous JJ . SENT A DT machine NN could MD be VB programmed VVN to TO perform VV the DT same JJ job NN for IN pennies NNS on IN the DT dollar NN . SENT The DT public JJ likely JJ further JJR suspects NNS that IN many JJ journalists NNS could MD be VB disposed VVN of IN without IN adverse JJ effect NN upon IN the DT integrity NN of IN the DT news NN . SENT The DT industry NN has VHZ responded VVN by IN pushing VVG opinionated JJ and CC openly RB partisan JJ news NN moderators NNS who WP cynically RB retain VVP the DT rhetoric NN of IN objectivity NN . SENT And CC the DT journalistic JJ herd NN reinvents VVZ itself PP accordingly RB . SENT link NN posted VVD by IN sanson NP . SENT 12 CD . SENT 14 CD AM NP February NP 10 CD , , 2004 CD The DT American NP Taliban NP On IN the DT eve NN of IN the DT Iraq NP war NN , , Slavoj NP Zizek NP pointed VVD out RP that IN the DT public JJ debate NN , , spear NN headed VVN by IN media NNS jingoes NNS , , was VBD helping VVG to TO obscure VV critical JJ reflection NN upon IN , , what WP effectively RB goes VVZ on IN in IN our PP$ own JJ societies NNS , , up RB on IN what WP kind NN of IN society NN is VBZ emerging VVG HERE RB as IN the DT result NN of IN the DT war NN on IN terror NN . SENT He PP concludes VVZ . SENT The DT ultimate JJ result NN of IN the DT war NN will MD be VB a DT change NN in IN our PP$ political JJ order NN . SENT This DT change NN is VBZ well RB under IN way NN . SENT Liberals NNS eager JJ to TO criticize VV the DT President NP have VHP taken VVN up RP the DT neoconservative NN banner NN and CC now RB demand VV a DT hard JJ line NN on IN Pakistan NP and CC Saudi NP Arabia NP . SENT Conservatives NNS eager JJ to TO support VV the DT President NP , , on IN the DT other JJ hand NN , , retire VV from IN reality NN , , fantasizing VVG what WP the DT President NP might MD have VH said VVD were VBD he PP capable JJ of IN saying VVG what WP they PP desire VVP to TO hear VV from IN him PP . SENT Leftists NNS romanticize VV the DT grassroots NNS struggle NN for IN secular JJ democratic JJ reform NN in IN Iraq NP and CC Afghanistan NP , , while IN Christian JJ fundamentalists NNS envy VVP , , and CC are VBP inspired VVN by IN the DT incipient JJ power NN of IN religious JJ leaders NNS to TO contstrain VV such JJ development NN . SENT Some DT changes NNS are VBP not RB so RB subtle JJ . SENT Picture NN this DT . SENT A DT female JJ singer NN appears VVZ on IN national JJ television NN . SENT Her PP$ gestures NNS are VBP suggestive JJ , , her PP$ lyrics NNS erotic NN , , and CC her PP$ costume NN revealing JJ . SENT The DT public NN is VBZ aghast JJ . SENT For IN days NNS after IN , , they PP hurl VV insults NNS at IN her PP and CC the DT television NN station NN which WDT aired VVD the DT performance NN . SENT They PP vomit VV resentment NN and CC project VV their PP$ own JJ oppression NN upon IN the DT objects NNS of IN their PP$ derision NN . SENT They PP demand VVP such JJ crudity NN be VB banned VVN from IN the DT airwaves NNS lest IN it PP thoroughly RB corrupt JJ their PP$ culture NN . SENT In IN the DT end NN , , the DT government NN intervenes VVZ to TO protect VV the DT citiznery NN from IN its PP$ own JJ perverse JJ desires NNS , , and CC women NNS are VBP once RB again RB banned VVN from IN singing VVG on IN Afghanistan's JJ state NN television NN . SENT Perhaps RB American JJ conservatives NNS have VHP begun VVN taking VVG cues NNS from IN their PP$ counterparts NNS in IN Afghanistan NP and CC Iraq NP . SENT Though IN it PP is VBZ a DT given VVN that IN ninety CD nine CD percent NN of IN the DT product NN of IN the DT national JJ culture NN industry NN is VBZ regurgitated VVN trash NN , , the DT sickness NN of IN American JJ culture NN is VBZ more RBR apparent JJ in IN the DT mainstream JJ reception NN of IN the DT spectacle NN than IN in IN the DT spectacles NNS themselves PP . SENT The DT hysteria NN which WDT followed VVD last JJ week's NNS Super NP Bowl NP should MD give VV one CD pause NN . SENT Driven VVN and CC stoked VVN by IN ignorance NN mongers NNS on IN talk NN radio NN and CC cable NN news NN , , the DT fanatical JJ reaction NN to TO the DT half JJ time NN show NN continues VVZ unabated JJ . SENT Conservatives NNS have VHP already RB realized VVN that IN if IN you PP want VVP to TO change VV the DT content NN of IN television NN programming NN , , it PP does VVZ not RB suffice VV to TO simply RB change VV the DT channel NN . SENT Perhaps RB one CD day NN they PP will MD come VV to TO their PP$ senses NNS and CC throw VV their PP$ televisions NNS away RB , , or CC hang VV them PP from IN the DT trees NNS as IN the DT Taliban NP once RB did VVD . SENT At IN the DT moment NN , , middle JJ America NP is VBZ too RB dependent JJ upon IN television NN , , for IN everything NN from IN companionship NN to TO the DT formation NN of IN opinion NN , , to TO do VV so RB . SENT But CC the DT day NN may MD come VV . SENT There EX is VBZ nonetheless RB something NN deeply RB comical JJ about IN the DT fact NN that IN conservatives NNS take VVP popular JJ culture NN so RB seriously RB . SENT They've NP yet RB to TO realize VV that IN it PP thrives VVZ off RP their PP$ resentment NN . SENT The DT conservative JJ fascination NN with IN popular JJ culture NN is VBZ like IN an DT infant's NNS infatuation NN with IN its PP$ own JJ shit NN . SENT Conservatives NNS eat VVP it PP up RP because IN they PP don't VVD know VV any DT better RBR . SENT link NN posted VVD by IN sanson NP . SENT 4 LS . SENT 24 CD AM NP February NP 7 CD , , 2004 CD George NP Bush NP and CC the DT bi NP partisan JJ blackmail NN For IN all PDT the DT lipservice NN paid VVN to TO diversity NN and CC openness NN , , the DT ideological JJ narrowness NN and CC strategic JJ nearsightedness NN of IN left JJ liberalism NN is VBZ really RB quite RB astounding VVG . SENT In IN an DT open JJ letter NN to TO Ralph NP Nader NP , , the DT editors NNS of IN the DT Nation NP advise VVP against IN his PP$ mounting VVG a DT presidential JJ campaign NN , , stating VVG , , The DT context NN for IN an DT independent JJ presidential JJ bid NN is VBZ completely RB altered VVN from IN 2000 CD , , when WRB there EX was VBD a DT real JJ base NN for IN a DT protest NN candidate NN . SENT The DT overwhelming JJ mass NN of IN voters NNS with IN progressive JJ values NNS . SENT . SENT . SENT have VHP only RB one CD focus NN this DT year NN . SENT to TO beat VV Bush NP . SENT These DT are VBP people NNS uninterested JJ in IN radical JJ social JJ change NN . SENT They PP are VBP reformists NNS in IN the DT worst JJS sense NN of IN the DT term NN . SENT However RB , , they PP do VVP touch NN upon IN one CD of IN the DT most RBS deleterious JJ effects NNS the DT Bush NP presidency NN has VHZ had VHN on IN the DT American JJ public NN . SENT almost RB everything NN left VVN of IN center NN is VBZ united VVN in IN opposition NN to TO it PP . SENT The DT Democrats NPS could MD not RB have VH manufactured VVN a DT better JJR situation NN for IN themselves PP . SENT People NNS who WP bowed VVD out RP of IN bi NP partisan JJ politics NNS and CC vowed VVD never RB again RB to TO vote VV for IN one CD of IN the DT two CD duopoly NN parties NNS are VBP now RB set VVN to TO vote VV for IN a DT Democrat NP just RB to TO ensure VV that IN Bush NP is VBZ unseated JJ . SENT Bush's NP presidency NN has VHZ meant VVN the DT death NN of IN independent JJ insurgency NN on IN the DT left NN . SENT Indeed RB , , this DT revolt NN seems VVZ even RB to TO have VH been VBN coopted VVN by IN the DT Democratic NP Party NP , , in IN the DT form NN of IN Howard NP Dean NP . SENT In IN the DT furor NN to TO eject VV Bush NP from IN the DT White NP House NP , , we PP must MD not RB forget VV that IN installing VVG a DT Democrat NP there RB is VBZ hardly RB a DT solution NN to TO the DT problem NN which WDT is VBZ the DT status FW quo FW of IN the DT political JJ establishment NN in IN the DT United NP States NPS . SENT One CD of IN the DT ways NNS in IN which WDT the DT Republicran NP Democratic JJ duopoly NN maintains VVZ its PP$ political JJ hegemony NN is VBZ by IN disenfranchising VVG voters NNS in IN turn NN . SENT In IN 2000 CD liberals NNS and CC left JJ wingers NNS fed VVN up RP with IN the DT Democratic JJ Party NP establishment NN cost VVD Gore NP the DT election NN by IN either DT staying VVG home NN or CC voting NN Green NN . SENT In IN 2004 CD , , angry JJ conservatives NNS may MD just RB pay VV Bush NP the DT same JJ favor NN . SENT The DT fact NN that IN the DT readers NNS and CC editors NNS of IN the DT Nation NN likely RB have VHP little RB to TO no DT cognizance NN of IN this DT illustrates VVZ just RB how WRB narrow JJ their PP$ ideological JJ purview NN really RB is VBZ . SENT To TO assert VV that IN there EX is VBZ no DT real JJ base NN for IN a DT protest NN candidate NN is VBZ willfully RB to TO deceive VV oneself PP . SENT If IN Nationite NP leftists NNS stuck VVD to TO their PP$ principles NNS , , the DT base NN would MD now RB be VB larger JJR than IN it PP was VBD in IN 2000 CD , , now RB that IN so RB many JJ right NN wingers NNS have VHP been VBN alienated VVN by IN the DT leadership NN of IN the DT Republican JJ party NN . SENT The DT base NN for IN a DT viable JJ protest NN candidate NN would MD now RB be VB double RB what WP it PP was VBD in IN 2000 CD if IN more RBR so RB called VVN leftists NNS were VBD able JJ to TO put VV principle NN above IN partisanship NN . SENT Let's NNS be VB clear JJ . SENT Anybody NN but CC Bush NP means VVZ whatever WDT piece NN of IN political JJ trash NN the DT Democrats NPS decide VVP to TO float VV this DT time NN around RB . SENT It PP is VBZ of IN no DT use NN to TO argue VV that IN this DT time NN around IN the DT election NN is VBZ especially RB crucial JJ . SENT every DT four CD years NNS the DT Democrats NPS argue VVP that DT election NN of IN the DT Republican JJ rival NN will MD be VB the DT end NN of IN the DT world NN , , and CC that IN a DT vote NN for IN a DT third JJ party NN is VBZ a DT vote NN for IN the DT Republicans NPS . SENT Yet CC partisan JJ Democrats NNS probably RB do VVP not RB fear VV that IN Bush NP will MD lead VV the DT country NN to TO ruin VV as RB much RB as IN they PP fear VVP that IN Bush NP and CC the DT Republican NP Congress NP would MD finally RB get VV something NN right NN if IN Bush NP were VBD to TO serve VV a DT second JJ term NN , , further RBR endearing VVG themselves PP to TO the DT US NP populace NN . SENT On IN the DT other JJ hand NN , , those DT on IN the DT left NN who WP are VBP prepared VVN to TO act VV against IN principle NN , , and CC have VHP resigned VVN themselves PP to TO voting VVG for IN the DT lesser JJR evil JJ Democrat NP , , whoever WP that WDT may MD be VB , , probably RB believe VVP that IN Bush NP would MD actually RB lead VV the DT country NN to TO ruin VV were VBD he PP to IN get VV a DT second JJ term NN . SENT But CC if IN this DT , , or CC something NN similar JJ to TO it PP , , were VBD to TO happen VV , , the DT situation NN would MD be VB ripe JJ for IN the DT overthrow VV of IN the DT two CD party NN system NN as IN we PP know VVP it PP . SENT Would MD it PP not RB . SENT Imagine VV going VVG for IN broke JJ and CC throwing VVG your PP$ vote NN to TO Bush NP because IN you PP believe VVP Bush NP would MD exascerbate VV various JJ economic JJ and CC social JJ polarizations NNS , , and CC deepen VV political JJ antagonisms NNS , , with IN the DT understanding NN that IN if IN this DT were VBD to TO happen VV , , real JJ political JJ and CC social JJ upheaval NN would MD be VB easier JJR to TO coax VV out RP of IN an DT ailing JJ public NN . SENT Or CC what WP . SENT Put VV a DT Democrat NP in IN the DT White NP House NP . SENT Why WRB . SENT Independent JJ liberals NNS and CC leftists NNS should MD not RB only RB be VB organizing VVG to TO unseat VV Bush NP , , they PP should MD be VB ferreting VVG out RP disenfranchised VVN conservatives NNS who WP are VBP now RB hell NN bent NN on IN overturning VVG the DT order NN . SENT These DT are VBP people NNS who WP have VHP come VVN to TO believe VV that IN there EX is VBZ little JJ or CC no DT difference NN between IN the DT Republican JJ and CC Democratic JJ parties NNS , , precisely RB as IN many JJ liberals NNS and CC leftists NNS were VBD arguing VVG just RB four CD years NNS ago RB . SENT Our PP$ politicians NNS , , both CC Republican NP and CC Democrat NP , , are VBP all RB too RB willing JJ to TO malign VV partisan JJ politics NNS in IN the DT name NN of IN unity NN and CC Americanism NN . SENT This DT should MD arouse VV suspicion NN . SENT Bi NP partisan JJ politics NNS is VBZ the DT problem NN , , and CC extreme JJ , , rabid JJ partisanship NN is VBZ the DT solution NN . SENT The DT real JJ base NN for IN a DT protest NN candidate NN consists VVZ of IN every DT voter NN who WP has VHZ come VVN to TO understand VV that DT Republicans NPS and CC Democrats NPS do VVP not RB each DT offer NN half NN assed VVD solutions NNS to TO problems NNS , , but CC rather RB that IN together RB they PP redouble VV and CC compound VV such JJ problems NNS . SENT In IN a DT so RB called VVN news NN analysis NN on IN the DT commission NN Bush NP has VHZ appointed VVN to TO investigate VV the DT failure NN of IN US NP intelligence NN , , David NP Sanger NP writes VVZ , , the DT commission's NNS makeup NN seems VVZ to TO have VH been VBN influenced VVN more RBR by IN a DT quest NN for IN political JJ balance NN than IN for IN depth NN of IN knowledge NN . SENT In IN other JJ words NNS , , the DT panel NN is VBZ bi NP partisan JJ and CC it PP will MD accomplish VV nothing NN but CC a DT whitewash NN on IN the DT issue NN of IN executive JJ malfeasance NN . SENT But CC Sanger NP , , a DT New NP York NP Times NP establishmentarian NN , , nonetheless RB concludes VVZ his PP$ analysis NN by IN impotently RB capitulating VVG to TO the DT necessities NNS of IN politics NNS and CC power NN . SENT This DT is VBZ precisely RB the DT logic NN which WDT leads VVZ the DT disgusted JJ and CC the DT disenchanted JJ , , year NN after IN year NN , , and CC though IN their PP$ better JJR judgment NN advises VVZ them PP against IN it PP , , to TO cast VV a DT vote NN against IN the DT other JJ guy NN and CC in IN favor NN of IN the DT two CD party NN system NN . SENT This DT is VBZ the DT spell NN that WDT must MD be VB broken VVN . SENT link NN posted VVD by IN sanson NP . SENT 2 LS . SENT 00 CD AM NP February NP 6 CD , , 2004 CD Media NP bias NN is VBZ a DT media NN virus NN The DT advent NN of IN a DT notion NN like IN media NNS literacy NN demonstrates VVZ that IN US NP citizens NNS are VBP increasingly RB suspicious JJ of IN the DT industry NN which WDT feeds VVZ them PP its PP$ news NN . SENT And CC the DT press NN fakers NNS are VBP afraid JJ . SENT Polls NNS which WDT show VVP that IN young JJ people NNS increasingly RB get VVP their PP$ news NN from IN Jay NP Leno NP and CC The DT Daily NP Show NP do VVP not RB demonstrate VV that IN young JJ people NNS are VBP somehow RB uninterested JJ in IN what's NNS going VVG on IN in IN their PP$ world NN . SENT Rather RB , , young JJ people NNS understand VVP that DT news NN reporting NN is VBZ a DT joke NN . SENT The DT Bush NP administration NN is VBZ right JJ to TO view VV the DT media NNS as IN yet RB another DT special JJ interest NN . SENT When WRB mainstreamers NNS talk VVP about IN media NNS bias NN , , they PP are VBP talking VVG about IN the DT political JJ prejudices NNS of IN reporters NNS and CC persons NNS in IN the DT media NNS industry NN , , not RB the DT industry NN itself PP , , or CC even RB the DT medium NN itself PP . SENT The DT greater JJR portion NN of IN the DT public NN buys VVZ into IN these DT arguments NNS , , and CC even RB folk NN on IN the DT far RB left VVN are VBP not RB immune JJ to TO the DT fantasy NN that IN the DT medium NN is VBZ inherently RB biased VVN toward IN their PP$ own JJ positions NNS . SENT Such JJ mysticism NN is VBZ hardly RB preferable JJ to TO typically RB superficial JJ conservative JJ media NNS analysis NN . SENT When WRB people NNS talk VVP about IN media NN bias NN they PP refer VVP for IN the DT most JJS part NN to TO the DT personal JJ political JJ biases NNS of IN reporters NNS and CC industry NN bureaucrats NNS . SENT However RB , , such JJ bias NN has VHZ little JJ or CC nothing NN to TO do VV with IN the DT medium NN itself PP . SENT And CC while IN there EX are VBP many JJ cases NNS in IN which WDT it PP would MD seem VV proper JJ to TO bring VV the DT messenger NN before IN the DT firing NN squad NN , , it PP seems VVZ also RB more RBR likely JJ that IN media NNS bias NN is VBZ non JJ partisan JJ because IN it PP is VBZ discursive JJ . SENT Take VV a DT well RB worn JJ phrase NN like IN Bush NP hatred NN , , for IN example NN . SENT One PP is VBZ tempted VVN to TO refer VV to TO such JJ syntagms NNS as IN memes NNS , , but CC meme NN is VBZ not RB sufficiently RB pejorative JJ . SENT Ipecac NN has VHZ previously RB termed VVN such JJ phrases NNS media NNS viruses NNS because IN they PP substitute VV themselves PP for IN explanation NN and CC relieve VV the DT corporate JJ commentator NN of IN his PP$ or CC her PP$ duty NN to TO conduct VV serious JJ thoughtful JJ analysis NN . SENT These DT are VBP better JJR indicators NNS of IN anything NN that WDT could MD be VB termed VVN media NN bias NN than IN even RB the DT complete JJ voting NN records NNS of IN journalists NNS and CC reporters NNS . SENT The DT latter NN may MD confirm VV suspicions NNS regarding VVG a DT specific JJ hack's NNS or CC rag's NNS often RB blatantly RB obvious JJ political JJ biases NNS , , but CC it PP would MD leave VV us PP in IN the DT dark NN on IN the DT issue NN of IN the DT media NNS qua IN media NNS . SENT Media NNS catch VVP phrases NNS , , on IN the DT other JJ hand NN , , illustrate VVP the DT industry's JJ fundamental JJ limitations NNS . SENT the DT tendancy NN to TO reductive JJ simplification NN and CC the DT corresponding JJ anti JJ intellectualism NN , , sensationalism NN , , inability NN or CC unwillingness NN to TO indulge VV in IN extensive JJ research NN of IN various JJ issues NNS or CC topics NNS , , faulty JJ fact NN checking NN , , the DT fascination NN with IN violence NN , , the DT pernicious JJ effects NNS of IN corporate JJ advertising NN etc NN . SENT Bush NP hatred NN is VBZ a DT media NN virus NN , , a DT result NN of IN the DT biases NNS of IN the DT medium NN itself PP . SENT As RB such JJ it PP is VBZ non JJ partisan JJ . SENT By IN convention NN , , Republicans NNS and CC conservatives NNS decry VV it PP , , while IN Democrats NNS and CC liberals NNS explain VVP it PP away RP . SENT It PP is VBZ neither RB an DT asset NN nor CC a DT liability NN . SENT For IN all PDT the DT attention NN it PP receives VVZ , , it PP is VBZ little RB more JJR than IN journalistic JJ shorthand NN . SENT While IN there EX are VBP certainly RB many JJ individuals NNS who WP justly RB hate VVP the DT President NP , , Bush NP hatred NN signifies VVZ not RB this DT phenomenon NN , , but CC rather RB a DT specific JJ discursive JJ limit NN . SENT Coined VVN by IN Republican JJ party NN loyalists NNS , , it PP signifies VVZ the DT limits NNS of IN their PP$ partisan JJ comprehension NN , , the DT fact NN that IN they PP cannot NN understand VV why WRB someone NN would MD dislike VV their PP$ favored JJ party's NN leader NN . SENT Naive JJ liberals NNS have VHP proudly RB risen VVN to TO the DT occassion NN and CC attempted VVD to TO make VV the DT term NN their PP$ own JJ . SENT This DT strategy NN , , however RB , , will MD fail VV . SENT Unlike IN nigger NN or CC fag NN , , terms NNS which WDT have VHP been VBN effectively RB appropriated VVN by IN groups NNS they PP were VBD orginally RB used VVN to TO slander VV , , it PP will MD never RB be VB taboo JJ for IN partisan JJ Bush NP jingoes NNS to TO utter JJ terms NNS like IN Bush NP hatred NN or CC Bush NP hater NN within IN the DT confines NNS of IN a DT mainstream JJ political JJ debate NN . SENT Unless IN . SENT . SENT . SENT link NN posted VVD by IN sanson NP . SENT 5 LS . SENT 42 CD PM NP Media NP illiteracy NN Mainstream NN media NNS criticism NN , , which WDT is VBZ , , of IN course NN , , the DT mainstream JJ media's NN criticism NN of IN itself PP , , rarely RB strays VVZ far RB from IN narrow JJ partisan JJ interpretations NNS of IN manifest JJ content NN . SENT Some DT admittedly RB mediocre JJ commentators NNS do VVP go VV so RB far RB as IN to TO dredge VV the DT social JJ unconscious JJ for IN latent JJ meaning NN . SENT And CC others NNS even RB note VVP how WRB aesthetics NNS can MD color VV the DT media's JJ reception NN of IN an DT event NN , , which WDT is VBZ nothing NN other JJ than IN the DT typical JJ reporter's NN tendency NN to TO be VB distracted VVN from IN the DT real JJ work NN at IN hand NN by IN small JJ shiny JJ objects NNS and CC changes NNS in IN fashion NN . SENT Formal JJ criticism NN , , on IN the DT other JJ hand NN , , is VBZ for IN the DT most JJS part NN confined VVN to TO the DT obligatory JJ sneer NN aimed VVN at IN sound JJ bites NNS and CC news NN tickers NNS , , and CC the DT occassional JJ assertion NN that IN news NN organizations NNS are VBP beholden JJ to TO the DT whims NNS of IN their PP$ advertisers NNS and CC corporate JJ underwriters NNS . SENT On IN the DT whole NN , , the DT corporate JJ media's NNS take VVP on IN itself PP is VBZ shamefully RB primitive JJ . SENT The DT situation NN has VHZ become VVN so RB critical JJ that IN fact NN checking NN must MD be VB applauded VVD when WRB it PP actually RB takes VVZ place NN . SENT Why WRB . SENT The DT right NN has VHZ been VBN allowed VVN , , almost RB unimpeded JJ , , to TO control VV the DT terms NNS and CC premises NNS of IN the DT debate NN . SENT According VVG to TO conventional JJ conservative JJ wisdom NN , , the DT mass JJ media NN slant NN reports NNS in IN favor NN of IN the DT liberal JJ position NN on IN issues NNS . SENT By IN the DT time NN liberals NNS got VVD around RP to TO responding VVG to TO this DT criticism NN , , the DT ideological JJ make VV up RP of IN the DT media NNS landscape NN had VHD changed VVN . SENT And CC so RB they PP wondered VVD , , What WP liberal JJ media NNS . SENT Pointing VVG to TO radio NN personalities NNS like IN Limbaugh NP and CC Hannity NP , , and CC the DT inception NN of IN FOX NN News NNS , , liberals NNS now RB charge VVP that IN much RB of IN the DT mainstream NN media NNS is VBZ in IN fact NN slanted VVN toward IN the DT conservative JJ position NN on IN issues NNS . SENT This DT does VVZ little JJ to TO counteract VV conservative JJ influence NN within IN the DT debate NN however RB , , because RB in IN so RB doing VVG liberals NNS accept VV the DT conservative JJ position NN in IN theory NN , , and CC simply RB make VV the DT appropriate JJ substitutions NNS in IN practice NN . SENT It PP is VBZ for IN this DT reason NN that IN media NNS bias NN has VHZ become VVN synonymous JJ with IN partisan JJ political JJ bias NN . SENT Mainstream NN media NNS criticism NN , , whether CC vented VVD on IN right JJ wing NN radio NN or CC scribbled VVD in IN the DT liberal JJ press NN , , appears VVZ primitive JJ because IN this DT theory NN is VBZ woefully RB outdated JJ . SENT More JJR than IN twenty CD years NNS ago RB , , conservatives NNS felt VVD their PP$ positions NNS were VBD getting VVG the DT short JJ end NN of IN the DT media NNS schtick NN . SENT They PP determined VVD that IN the DT press NN and CC mass NN media NNS were VBD overwhelmingly RB liberal JJ , , and CC to TO this DT day NN conclude VVP that IN the DT personal JJ political JJ prejudices NNS of IN reporters NNS and CC other JJ assorted JJ industry NN slime NN are VBP responsible JJ for IN the DT media's JJ obvious JJ shortcomings NNS . SENT Yet CC these DT are VBP the DT same JJ folks NNS who WP cry VVP about IN political JJ polarization NN and CC the DT culture NN wars NNS of IN the DT 50 CD 50 CD nation NN . SENT The DT media NNS industry NN is VBZ magically RB insulated VVN from IN the DT most RBS broad JJ social JJ trends NNS conservatives NNS allow VVP themselves PP to TO recognize VV . SENT This DT is VBZ not RB coincidental JJ . SENT It PP allows VVZ conservative JJ media NNS critics NNS to TO maintain VV the DT fantasy NN that IN they PP are VBP not RB mainstream JJ , , despite IN all DT evidence NN to TO the DT contrary NN . SENT Really RB , , conservatives NNS perceive VVP no DT irony NN when WRB Limbaugh NP , , with IN twenty CD million CD people NNS listening VVG , , denounces VVZ mainstream NN media NNS . SENT Similarly RB with IN cable NN news NN folk NN like IN Scarborough NP and CC O'reilly NP . SENT For IN the DT sake NN of IN perspective NN on IN what WP mainstream NN is VBZ , , it PP could MD be VB noted VVN that IN the DT New NP York NP Times NP has VHZ a DT circulation NN of IN less JJR than IN two CD million CD . SENT Mainstream JJ conservatism NN mainstream NN liberalism NN widespread JJ media NNS illiteracy NN . SENT link NN posted VVD by IN sanson NP . SENT 2 LS . SENT 06 CD PM NP February NP 4 CD , , 2004 CD In IN praise NN of IN witch NN hunting NN Last JJ week NN a DT federal JJ judge NN struck VVD down RP part NN of IN the DT Patriot NN Act NP , , ruling NN , , according VVG to TO the DT Guardian NP , , that IN a DT measure NN of IN the DT act NN that IN bars NNS giving VVG expert NN advice NN or CC assistance NN to TO groups NNS designated VVN foreign JJ terrorist JJ organizations NNS is VBZ too RB vague JJ , , threatening VVG First NP and CC Fifth NP Amendment NP rights NNS . SENT The DT reception NN of IN the DT decision NN has VHZ been VBN predictably RB split VVN along IN partisan JJ lines NNS . SENT Progressives NNS applauded VVD and CC conservatives NNS grumbled VVD . SENT Upon IN closer JJR inspection NN , , however RB , , it PP becomes VVZ clear JJ that IN the DT right JJ wing NN is VBZ likely RB conflicted VVN on IN this DT issue NN . SENT After IN all DT , , without IN the DT ruling NN Richard NP Perle NP link NN via IN TPM NP could MD have VH been VBN prosecuted VVN for IN lending VVG his PP$ expert NN opinion NN and CC advice NN to TO known VVN terrorist JJ organizations NNS . SENT This DT gives VVZ one CD pause NN . SENT Liberals NNS , , and CC many JJ on IN the DT left NN are VBP suspicious JJ of IN measures NNS like IN the DT Patriot NN Act NN , , and CC rightly RB so RB . SENT Even RB if IN the DT Patriot NN Act NN is VBZ currently RB not RB being VBG abused VVN , , surely RB it PP could MD be VB abused VVN , , and CC therefore RB it PP should MD be VB allowed VVN to TO expire VV so RB that IN more RBR reasonable JJ and CC well RB thought VVD out RP legislation NN could MD take VV its PP$ place NN . SENT The DT Patriot NN Act NN is VBZ thus RB , , in IN many JJ quarters NNS , , considered VVN dangerous JJ because IN of IN its PP$ possible JJ unintended JJ consequences NNS . SENT However RB , , these DT are VBP not RB necessarily RB all RB negative JJ . SENT We PP could MD be VB sneaking VVG peeks NNS at IN our PP$ representatives NNS , , or CC the DT stooges NNS in IN the DT White NP House NP , , or CC the DT bureaucrats NNS in IN the DT Pentagon NP . SENT The DT Patriot NN Act NN , , or CC something NN similar JJ to TO it PP , , could MD be VB quite RB useful JJ in IN the DT hands NNS of IN an DT engaged VVN citizenry NN highly RB suspicious JJ of IN the DT corrupt JJ government NN which WDT lords NNS over IN it PP . SENT Let VV the DT witch NN hunting NN begin VV . SENT link NN posted VVD by IN sanson NP . SENT 9 CD . SENT 20 CD PM NP February NP 3 CD , , 2004 CD The DT people NNS and CC the DT politicos NNS , , superstition NN and CC paranoia NN One NN curious JJ feature NN of IN the DT United NP States NPS is VBZ that IN its PP$ citizenry NN is VBZ extremely RB superstitious JJ . SENT Superstition NN cuts NNS across IN class NN , , race NN and CC gender NN lines NNS , , and CC infects VVZ political JJ discourse NN . SENT Many JJ mainstream NN commentators NNS , , for IN instance NN , , are VBP unwilling JJ to TO draw VV attention NN to TO the DT fact NN that IN the DT prospects NNS for IN Bush's NP reelection NN are VBP looking VVG pretty RB grim JJ at IN the DT moment NN . SENT Liberals NNS likely JJ don't NN want VVP to TO jinx VV the DT lesser JJR evil JJ Democrat NP , , while IN conservatives NNS probably RB fear VVP that IN any DT such JJ utterance NN would MD jinx VV the DT President's NP still RB emerging VVG campaign NN . SENT In IN any DT case NN , , partisan JJ Republicans NNS are VBP noticably RB scared VVN , , for IN they PP have VHP set VVN themselves PP down RP the DT path NN of IN recovery NN . SENT Step NN one NN . SENT admit VV the DT President NP has VHZ a DT problem NN . SENT If IN you PP expect VVP to TO hear VV the DT President NP and NP or CC his PP$ many JJ loyalists NNS admit VVP that IN he PP has VHZ done VVN wrong JJ , , don't JJ hold VVP your PP$ breath NN , , that's NNS step NN ten CD . SENT More JJR than IN three CD years NNS after IN George NP W NP . SENT Bush NP was VBD appointed VVN to TO the DT Office NN of IN the DT Presidency NP under IN extremely RB suspicious JJ circumstances NNS , , conservatives NNS are VBP finally RB beginning VVG to TO realize VV that IN the DT President NP has VHZ a DT credibility NN problem NN . SENT Acknowledgment NN of IN this DT credibility NN problem NN , , and CC the DT fact NN that IN it PP is VBZ perceived VVN as IN constitutive JJ of IN the DT Bush NP Presidency NP by IN innumerable JJ people NNS across IN the DT country NN and CC around IN the DT world NN , , may MD just RB be VB a DT prerequisite NN for IN any DT reasonable JJ explanation NN of IN so RB called VVN Bush NP hatred NN . SENT Thus RB it PP is VBZ not RB surprising JJ that IN many JJ conservative JJ minds NNS simply RB gave VVD up RP or CC broke VVD down RB and CC brushed VVD Bush NP hatred NN off RB by IN projecting VVG their PP$ own JJ irrational JJ partisanship NN upon IN those DT afflicted VVN with IN the DT malaise NN . SENT Conservative JJ misgivings NNS about IN the DT Bush NP Presidency NP are VBP more RBR readily RB aired VVN now RB in IN the DT aftermath NN of IN David NP Kay's NP resignation NN and CC his PP$ remarks NNS to TO the DT effect NN that IN Iraq NP did VVD not RB possess VV the DT alleged JJ WMD NP . SENT Yet CC Kay's NP blanket NN admission NN of IN guilt NN we PP were VBD all DT wrong NN conveniently RB exonerates VVZ the DT Bush NP administration NN of IN any DT and CC all DT responsibility NN for IN its PP$ own JJ errors NNS of IN judgment NN . SENT Thus RB does VVZ the DT blame NN game NN continue VV . SENT Liberals NNS blame VVP the DT administration NN and CC the DT neoconservative NN ideolgical JJ bubble NN . SENT Conservatives NNS blame VVP the DT CIA NP and CC the DT intelligence NN bureaucracy NN . SENT Let's NP not RB forget VV , , in IN our PP$ zealotry NN , , to TO blame VV the DT Congress NP which WDT gave VVD the DT President NP a DT blank JJ check NN to TO wage VV his PP$ war NN a DT check NN which WDT he PP has VHZ yet RB to TO cash NN , , let VVD alone RB fill VV out RP , , or CC the DT citizenry NN who WP put VVD all PDT these DT people NNS in IN office NN , , or CC that DT reactionary JJ faction NN of IN the DT public NN which WDT attended VVD pro JJ war NN rallies NNS organized VVN by IN the DT likes NN of IN Clear NP Channel NP radio NN . SENT George NP W NP . SENT Bush NP is VBZ weak JJ on IN national JJ security NN and CC defense NN . SENT He PP and CC Cheney NP now RB appear VVP in IN an DT especially RB bad JJ light NN , , to TO say VV the DT least JJS , , since IN just JJ days NNS before IN Kay's NP revelations NNS they PP were VBD still RB claiming VVG that IN we PP have VHP good JJ intelligence NN . SENT Fortunately RB , , the DT White NP House NP will MD always RB come VV up RP with IN the DT short JJ end NN of IN the DT stick NN in IN the DT blame NN game NN between IN the DT CIA NP and CC the DT administration NN . SENT Even RB if IN only RB the DT CIA NP were VBD faulted VVN with IN producing VVG dangerously RB inaccurate JJ intelligence NN , , Bush NP is VBZ still RB culpable JJ because IN , , in IN making VVG his PP$ case NN for IN war NN , , he PP determined VVD that IN the DT intelligence NN on IN Iraq's NP WMD NP was VBD accurate JJ and CC trustworthy JJ , , when WRB in IN fact NN it PP wasn't VVD , , or CC does VVZ not RB appear VV to TO be VB . SENT He PP misjudged VVD a DT potential JJ threat NN because IN he PP let VVP himself PP be VB misguided VVN by IN his PP$ advisors NNS . SENT The DT standard JJ retort NN to TO this DT criticism NN is VBZ that IN it PP is VBZ better JJR to TO err VV on IN the DT side NN of IN caution NN . SENT Yet RB , , when WRB the DT stakes NNS are VBP so RB high JJ , , it PP is VBZ better RBR still RB not RB to TO have VH erred VVN at IN all DT . SENT Bush's NP naivety NN differentiates VVZ him PP from IN the DT morass NN of IN neocon NN commentators NNS who WP have VHP no DT qualms NNS about IN attacking VVG the DT intelligence NN bureaucracy NN and CC the DT State NP Department NP on IN even RB the DT flimsiest JJS ideological JJ grounds NNS . SENT Perle NP , , for IN instance NN , , was VBD recently RB quoted VVN in IN the DT New NP York NP Times NP as IN saying VVG , , I PP have VHP long RB thought VVN our PP$ intelligence NN in IN the DT Gulf NP has VHZ been VBN woefully RB inadequate JJ . SENT Given VVN Perle's NP influence NN , , which WDT is VBZ both DT great JJ and CC small JJ , , the DT Bush NP administration NN must MD have VH been VBN aware JJ that IN CIA NP intelligence NN was VBD not RB exactly RB reliable JJ , , despite IN the DT fact NN that IN it PP was VBD rarely RB disputed VVN by IN the DT international JJ community NN . SENT Thus RB the DT necessity NN of IN the DT various JJ alternative JJ intelligence NN aggregators NNS established VVN by IN the DT administration NN for IN example NN , , the DT famed JJ Office NN of IN Special JJ Plans NNS . SENT This DT intelligence NN , , however RB , , was VBD no DT more RBR accurate JJ than IN that RB being VBG spit VVN out RP by IN the DT intelligence NN agencies NNS bureaucratic JJ machinery NN . SENT On IN the DT contrary NN , , it PP paranoically RB exaggerated VVN the DT CIA's NP distortions NNS . SENT Appearances NNS aside RB , , this DT may MD not RB be VB an DT instance NN of IN Reagan's NP Bind NN . SENT It PP cannot NN be VB expected VVN that IN the DT president NN or CC , , in IN any DT case NN , , this DT president NN , , unlike IN his PP$ father NN be VB a DT competent JJ judge NN and CC interpreter NN of IN raw JJ intelligence NN . SENT That's NNS why WRB he PP has VHZ advisors NNS . SENT On IN the DT other JJ hand NN , , his PP$ advisors NNS seem VVP not RB so RB malicious JJ as IN they PP were VBD cynical JJ . SENT Happily RB , , this DT cynicism NN is VBZ beginning VVG to TO rub VV off RP on IN conservative JJ voters NNS . SENT link NN posted VVD by IN sanson NP . SENT 6 CD . SENT 35 CD PM NP February NP 2 CD , , 2004 CD The DT tolerance NN of IN conservatives NNS One CD of IN the DT most RBS interesting JJ contradictions NNS of IN the DT Republicans NPS conservative JJ base NN surfaces VVZ on IN the DT twin JJ issues NNS of IN big JJ media NNS and CC media NNS consolidation NN . SENT When WRB the DT FCC NP approved VVD the DT expansion NN of IN media NNS conglomerates NNS from IN 35 CD to TO 45 CD percent NN of IN the DT national JJ market NN last JJ summer NN , , people NNS from IN across IN the DT political JJ spectrum NN rose VVD up RP to TO denounce VV the DT changes NNS . SENT The DT NRA NN and CC conservative JJ religious JJ groups NNS were VBD suddenly RB aligned VVN with IN mainstream JJ liberals NNS suspicious JJ of IN the DT mass JJ media NNS and CC left VVN wing NN media NNS reform NN activists NNS . SENT The DT media NNS were VBD stunned VVN to TO learn VV that IN huge JJ swaths NNS of IN the DT American JJ population NN detested VVD them PP , , and CC they PP were VBD dumbfounded JJ when WRB the DT Senate NP and CC Congress NP quickly RB sought VVD to TO address VV people's NP concern NN on IN this DT issue NN and CC effectively RB overturn VV the DT rules NNS changes NNS by IN refusing VVG to TO fund VV them PP . SENT Yet RB the DT spending NN bill NN approved VVD last JJ week NN nonetheless RB funds VVZ a DT compromise NN rule NN change NN which WDT allows VVZ the DT FCC NP to TO raise VV the DT ownership NN threshold NN to TO 39 CD . SENT Why WRB . SENT In IN September NP , , the DT Senate NP voted VVD to TO block VV the DT FCC's NP proposed VVN changes NNS , , but CC the DT House NP has VHZ yet RB to TO cast VV a DT definitive JJ vote NN on IN the DT issue NN , , despite IN , , or CC rather RB because IN there EX is VBZ strong JJ bipartisan JJ support NN to TO second JJ the DT Senate's NP agreement NN . SENT See VV this DT timeline NN for IN links NNS to TO relevant JJ documents NNS . SENT It PP seems VVZ Hastert NP and CC Delay NP , , with IN the DT Bush NP administration's NN support NN , , blocked VVD the DT vote NN in IN order NN to TO bail VV out RP the DT media NNS conglomerates NNS , , specifically RB Viacam NP and CC News NP Corporation NP , , CBS NP and CC FOX NN , , who WP were VBD already RB in IN violation NN of IN the DT old JJ ownership NN caps NNS , , at IN around IN 38 CD . SENT Talk NN about IN legalizing VVG illegals NNS . SENT This DT is VBZ a DT clear JJ example NN of IN corporations NNS capturing VVG their PP$ regulators NNS . SENT But CC it PP is VBZ quid NN pro FW quo FW . SENT Let's NNS not RB forget VVP that IN CBS NP has VHZ become VVN quite RB accustomed JJ to TO heeding VVG and CC anticipating VVG the DT demands NNS of IN the DT Republican JJ leadership NN and CC conservative JJ activists NNS , , whether IN in IN their PP$ actual JJ programming NN The DT Reagans NNS or CC in IN their PP$ advertising NN space NN the DT illigitimate JJ MoveOn NP ad NN . SENT From IN here RB we PP can MD glimpse VV the DT fissures NNS in IN an DT apparently RB united VVN conservative JJ front NN . SENT Consider VV the DT two CD most RBS obvious JJ examples NNS of IN conservative JJ media NNS criticism NN . SENT On IN the DT one CD hand NN , , voices NNS on IN the DT radio NN and CC elsewhere RB rail NN against IN the DT excesses NNS and CC biases NNS of IN the DT liberal JJ press NN and CC national JJ news NN broadcasters NNS . SENT On IN the DT other JJ , , organizations NNS like IN the DT the DT Parents NP Television NP Council NP wage NN thoroughgoing JJ crusades NNS to TO make VV sure RB the DT media NNS do VVP not RB offend VV the DT tastes NNS of IN a DT certain JJ faction NN of IN the DT television NN watching VVG public NN . SENT Perhaps RB surprisingly RB , , these DT two CD groups NNS come VVN down RP on IN opposite JJ sides NNS of IN the DT fence NN on IN the DT issue NN of IN media NNS expansion NN . SENT Limbaugh NP , , for IN instance NN , , thinks VVZ consolidation NN will MD lead VV to TO more JJR conservative JJ programming NN . SENT The DT PTC NN thinks VVZ such JJ centralization NN will MD override VV localism NN and CC community NN controls NNS on IN programming NN . SENT What WP ties VVZ them PP together RB , , however RB , , is VBZ their PP$ fetishization NN of IN content NN at IN the DT expense NN of IN form NN . SENT Nonetheless RB , , it PP is VBZ a DT conservative JJ dilemma NN . SENT On IN this DT issue NN , , conservatives NNS are VBP torn VVN between IN their PP$ prudery NN and CC partisanship NN on IN the DT one CD hand NN , , and CC their PP$ instinct NN always RB to TO side NN with IN the DT interests NNS of IN corporations NNS over IN the DT interests NNS of IN actual JJ persons NNS on IN the DT other JJ . SENT The DT backroom NN deal NN reached VVN by IN Delay NP , , Hastert NP and CC the DT Bush NP administration NN to TO legalize VV Viacom NP and CC News NP Corp NP . SENT over IN and CC against IN the DT demands NNS of IN the DT American JJ public NN clearly RB demonstrates VVZ the DT low JJ regard NN in IN which WDT the DT Republican JJ leadership NN holds VVZ its PP$ popular JJ base NN , , while IN the DT virtually RB non JJ existent JJ outcry NN over IN this DT obvious JJ abuse NN of IN power NN reveals VVZ just RB how WRB oblivious JJ that DT base NN is VBZ to TO the DT political JJ corruption NN of IN its PP$ favored JJ party's NN leadership NN . SENT Many JJ of IN today's JJ conservatives NNS undoubedtly RB consider VVP themselves PP to TO be VB the DT heirs NNS of IN the DT great JJ awakening NN . SENT Yet RB they're NN asleep RB at IN the DT wheel NN . SENT link NN posted VVD by IN sanson NP . SENT 5 LS . SENT 40 CD PM NP blogrank NN PREVIOUS JJ NEXT JJ RANDOM JJ LIST NN SITES NNS Links NP Anarchist NN Librarians NNS Autonomedia NP Boycott VV the DT Bank NP CAGW NP Campaign NP Desk NN ConWebWatch NP CPI NP ctheory JJ Cursor NN FAIR JJ FAS NP Free NP Speech NN TV NP GNN NP In IN These DT Times NP Iraq NP Portal NP Knight NP Ridder NP Labor NP Notes NPS Media NP Education NP Memory NP Hole NP MEMRI NP Nothingness NN Open JJ Secrets NNS Philosophy NN Reference NN Political JJ Theory NN Politics NP 1 CD Reason NP RefDesk NP Remember VV John NP Stop NP TMC NP The DT Symptom NN TG's NP Political NP Wire NP Thomas NP World NP Press NP Review NP Blogs NP Agonist NN American JJ Leftist JJ American JJ Pundit NN Autonomist NN Average NP American NP Balkinization NP Bill's NP Gulch NN the DT bitter JJ shack NN Bluebus NP Chun NP Coffee NP House NP Studio NN The DT Daily JJ Czech JJ Demagogue NN Edward NP Pig NN for IN the DT time NN being VBG Informant NN Inspector NP Lohmann NP Karmalised NP John NP and CC Belle NP Lean NP Left NP Lenin's NP Tomb NP Libertarian JJ Jackass NN Liquid NP List NP Lunaville NP The DT Mad JJ Prophet NP Medienkritik NP Metajournalism NP MyIrony NP Orcinus NP Over IN the DT Rainbough NP Pacific NP Views NNS Palast NP Philosophy NN . SENT com NN Politburo NP Diktat NN Politics NNS in IN the DT Zeros NNS Postmodern NN Anarchist NN pure JJ bs NN The DT Red NP Pill NP Scoobie NP Davis NP Sick NP of IN Bush NP Slacktivist NP Sneakeasy's NP Joint NP Stand VVP Down IN Submerging VVG Markets NNS Talking VVG Dog NP Talking VVG Points NP Memo NN Talk NN Left VVD This DT Public NP Address NN UFO NP Breakfast NN Uncommon JJ Thought NN Wealth NN Bondage NN Webnesia NP Whiskey NN Bar NN wood NN s PP lot RB Archives NPS August NP 2003 CD September NP 2003 CD November NP 2003 CD December NP 2003 CD January NP 2004 CD February NP 2004 CD March NP 2004 CD April NP 2004 CD May NP 2004 CD June NP 2004 CD July NP 2004 CD Contact NN . SENT charlessanson NN hotmail NN . SENT com NN Atom NN Feed NN