/Users/andrea/_magisterarbeit/korpus/clean/testkorpus/19/file7.html NN ----------------------------------------- : Media NP Gateway NP Department NP of IN Foreign NP Affairs NPS and CC Trade NP Australian NP Government NP Department NP of IN Foreign NP Affairs NPS and CC Trade NP Skip NP to TO content VV About IN us PP Jobs NP FOI NP Tenders NNS Contact NN us PP Site NN Navigation NP . SENT Travel NN Advisories NNS Country NN information NN Trade NP Policy NP Global NP Issues NP Passports NNS Ministers NP About IN Australia NP Embassies NNS and CC Consulates NNS Treaties NNS Publications NP Home NP Portfolio NP websites VVZ ACIAR NP AusAID NP Austrade NP EFIC NP Site NN tools NNS Media NP Gateway NP Students NNS Gateway NP Business NP Gateway NP Site NN Feedback NN Site NN Index NP E NP and CC OE NP 15 NP December NP , , 2003 CD Transcript NN Minister NP for IN Foreign NP Affairs NPS , , Alexander NP Downer NP Doorstop NN interview NN , , Garden NP Island NP Naval NP Base NP , , Sydney NP REPORTER NN . SENT Mr NP Downer NP , , a DT question NN you PP usually RB ask VV sporting VVG stars NNS after IN a DT victory NN how WRB do VVP you PP feel VVP . SENT DOWNER NN . SENT Well RB , , obviously RB we PP feel VVP relieved VVN that IN Saddam NP Hussein NP has VHZ been VBN captured VVN . SENT I PP think VVP it PP wouldn NN t NN be VB a DT secret NN to TO tell VV you PP that IN we PP re IN absolutely RB delighted JJ that IN he PP s PP been VBN captured VVN . SENT I PP think VVP this DT has VHZ the DT potential NN to TO make VV an DT enormous JJ difference NN to TO the DT situation NN on IN the DT ground NN in IN Iraq NP in IN time NN . SENT It PP may MD not RB in IN the DT very RB short JJ term NN , , but CC in IN time NN I PP think VVP there EX are VBP two CD effects NNS that IN it PP ll RB have VHP . SENT First RB of IN all DT , , the DT ordinary JJ people NNS of IN Iraq NP will MD know VV that IN Saddam NP Hussein NP s PP regime NN is VBZ never RB coming VVG back RB , , and CC they PP ll RB be VB very RB relieved VVN about RB that IN . SENT And CC secondly RB , , those DT elements NNS that WDT have VHP been VBN attacking VVG coalition NN forces NNS and CC the DT Iraqis NNS themselves PP , , those DT supporters NNS of IN Saddam NP Hussein NP and CC their PP$ terrorist JJ friends NNS , , they PP ll RB know VVP that IN their PP$ attacks NNS are VBP not RB going VVG to TO bring VV back RB Saddam NP Hussein NP , , that IN his PP$ regime NN is VBZ absolutely RB finished VVN . SENT So RB I PP think VVP this DT is VBZ an DT enormously RB important JJ point NN in IN history NN for IN Iraq NP and CC for IN the DT broader JJR international JJ community NN . SENT And CC we PP couldn NN t NN be VB more RBR pleased VVN for IN the DT success NN of IN the DT Americans NPS in IN capturing VVG Saddam NP Hussein NP . SENT REPORTER NN . SENT Have VHP the DT Americans NPS advised VVD you PP at IN this DT stage NN what WP they PP re IN planning VVG to TO do VV with IN him PP . SENT DOWNER NN . SENT Well RB , , I PP had VHD a DT discussion NN this DT morning NN with IN Colin NP Powell NP about IN this DT . SENT I PP ve RB expressed VVD the DT view NN that IN here RB in IN Australia NP we PP think VVP it PP would MD be VB most RBS appropriate JJ if IN Saddam NP Hussein NP was VBD prosecuted VVN by IN the DT Iraqi JJ people NNS before IN an DT Iraqi JJ court NN . SENT He PP s PP an DT Iraqi JJ , , the DT people NNS who WP have VHP been VBN the DT victims NNS of IN Saddam NP Hussein NP haven NN t NN only RB been VBN Iraqis NNS but CC they PP have VHP largely RB been VBN Iraqis NNS . SENT And CC I PP think VVP to TO use VV this DT war NN crimes NNS tribunal NN , , or CC what WP s PP called VVD the DT Iraq NP Special JJ Tribunal NN that WDT has VHZ coincidentally RB only RB been VBN set VVN up RP in IN the DT last JJ couple NN of IN weeks NNS , , to TO prosecute VV Saddam NP Hussein NP would MD be VB a DT very RB constructive JJ way NN forward RB . SENT I PP think VVP the DT Americans NPS are VBP sympathetic JJ with IN that DT , , they PP re IN obviously RB looking VVG at IN the DT issue NN . SENT But CC I PP think VVP the DT alternative NN of IN dragging VVG him PP off RP to TO the DT United NP States NPS and CC finding VVG a DT way NN of IN prosecuting VVG him PP in IN an DT American JJ court NN or CC putting VVG him PP before IN some DT UN NP tribunal NN is VBZ much RB less RBR satisfactory JJ than IN ensuring VVG that IN the DT Iraqi JJ people NNS themselves PP can MD bring VV this DT monster NN to TO justice NN . SENT REPORTER NN . SENT What WP s VVZ your PP$ view NN on IN the DT possible JJ execution NN of IN Saddam NP Hussein NP . SENT DOWNER NN . SENT Well RB , , in IN the DT end NN that IN s PP going VVG to TO be VB a DT matter NN for IN whatever WDT tribunal NN he PP goes VVZ before RB . SENT It PP might MD be VB that IN the DT Iraqis NNS will MD choose VV that DT option NN , , that WDT they PP will MD choose VV capital NN punishment NN . SENT I PP personally RB am VBP not RB a DT supporter NN of IN capital NN punishment NN but CC on IN the DT other JJ hand NN if IN that WDT s PP the DT option NN chosen VVN by IN the DT Iraqis NNS , , that WDT s PP probably RB what WP will MD happen VV . SENT But CC we PP ll RB have VHP to TO wait VV and CC see VV . SENT They PP have VHP suspended VVN capital NN punishment NN in IN Iraq NP at IN the DT moment NN , , so RB whether IN they PP would MD reintroduce VV that IN for IN Saddam NP Hussein NP now RB at IN the DT end NN of IN the DT day NN , , I NN m NN not RB a DT supporter NN of IN capital NN punishment NN . SENT But CC when WRB you PP look VVP at IN the DT list NN of IN victims NNS of IN Saddam NP Hussein NP , , we PP found VVD three CD hundred CD thousand CD bodies NNS in IN somewhere RB between IN one CD hundred CD and CC fifty CD and CC two CD hundred CD mass JJ graves NNS in IN Iraq NP since IN the DT end NN of IN the DT war NN . SENT He PP started VVD two CD wars NNS against IN his PP$ neighbours NNS in IN which WDT over IN a DT million CD people NNS were VBD killed VVN . SENT He PP used VVD chemical NN weapons NNS against IN his PP$ own JJ people NNS . SENT What WP sort NN of IN a DT man NN is VBZ this DT . SENT And CC if IN in IN the DT end NN the DT Iraqis NNS chose VVD to TO execute VV him PP , , that IN probably RB wouldn NN t NN come VVN as IN a DT surprise NN to TO anybody NN . SENT REPORTER NN . SENT So RB you PP accept VVP that IN as RB inevitable JJ if IN you PP re IN going VVG through IN Iraqis NNS determining VVG his PP$ fate NN instead RB of IN the DT United NP Nations NPS in IN the DT international JJ indistinct JJ . SENT DOWNER NN . SENT I PP think VVP it PP s PP preferable JJ . SENT I PP think VVP it PP s PP much RB better RBR that IN he PP be VB prosecuted VVN by IN the DT Iraqis NNS in IN Iraq NP . SENT He PP was VBD the DT President NP of IN Iraq NP , , he PP s VVZ an DT Iraqi JJ , , and CC one CD of IN the DT principles NNS that WDT applies VVZ to TO the DT International NP Criminal NP Court NP is VBZ what WP s PP called VVD the DT principle NN of IN complementarity NN . SENT That DT is VBZ , , if IN there EX s PP a DT domestic JJ court NN that WDT can MD do VV the DT job NN , , the DT domestic JJ court NN should MD be VB given VVN preference NN over IN an DT international JJ tribunal NN . SENT I PP think VVP that DT is VBZ a DT good JJ principle NN . SENT I PP think VVP it PP would MD be VB better JJR that IN he PP was VBD prosecuted VVN in IN Iraq NP . SENT Now RB , , if IN for IN some DT reason NN that IN wasn NN t NN going VVG to TO happen VV , , that WDT would MD be VB a DT different JJ matter NN . SENT But CC it PP is VBZ going VVG to TO happen VV , , I PP don VV t NN think VVP the DT Iraqi JJ people NNS would MD want VV to TO do VV anything NN but CC prosecute VV Saddam NP Hussein NP for IN the DT wicked JJ crimes NNS that IN he PP s PP committed VVN over IN the DT last JJ three CD decades NNS . SENT REPORTER NN . SENT Even RB if IN the DT death NN penalty NN is VBZ somewhat RB inevitable JJ . SENT DOWNER NN . SENT I PP don VV t NN know VVP that IN it PP s PP inevitable JJ but CC I PP would MD say VV it PP s VVZ more RBR likely JJ than IN not RB that IN s PP up RB to TO the DT Iraqis NNS . SENT REPORTER NN . SENT While IN indistinct JJ different JJ operation NN , , does VVZ this DT give VVP us PP hope VVP that DT bin NN Laden JJ can MD indistinct JJ . SENT DOWNER NN . SENT The DT difficulty NN with IN Osama NP bin NN Laden JJ is VBZ that IN we PP believe VVP we PP know VVP the DT general JJ area NN where WRB he PP is VBZ but RB he PP moves VVZ across IN the DT border NN between IN Afghanistan NP and CC Pakistan NP , , so IN there EX are VBP some DT real JJ jurisdictional JJ issues NNS there RB . SENT The DT Pakistanis NNS don VV t NN allow VV the DT coalition NN troops NNS to TO cross VV the DT border NN into IN Pakistan NP . SENT So RB , , anyway RB it PP just RB reminds VVZ us PP we PP ve RB got VVD to TO get VV Osama NP bin NN Laden JJ and CC Mullah NN Omar NP and CC that IN they PP shouldn NN t NN think VVP for IN a DT minute NN we PP re IN giving VVG up RP on IN trying VVG to TO get VV them PP . SENT We PP re IN still RB working VVG at IN it PP . SENT REPORTER NN . SENT When WRB will MD you PP have VHP a DT clearer JJR picture NN about IN the DT withdrawal NN of IN Australia NP s PP military JJ commitment NN . SENT DOWNER NN . SENT Well RB , , it PP s VVZ too RB early JJ to TO make VV any DT commitment NN on IN that DT at IN the DT moment NN . SENT I PP think VVP we PP ll RB have VHP to TO wait VV and CC see VV how WRB the DT situation NN pans VVZ out RP . SENT I PP think VVP we PP ll RB have VHP some DT difficult JJ times NNS in IN the DT short JJ term NN in IN Iraq NP . SENT But CC I PP think VVP , , as IN time NN goes VVZ on RP , , the DT situation NN will MD get VV increasingly RB better RBR and CC the DT Iraqi JJ people NNS will MD really RB now RB strive VV to TO make VV their PP$ country NN work NN successfully RB . SENT By IN the DT middle NN of IN next JJ year NN , , Iraq NP should MD have VH more JJR than IN the DT Iraqi JJ Governing VVG Council NN they PP have VHP , , but CC a DT genuine JJ Iraqi JJ government NN and CC by IN the DT time NN we PP reach VVP that DT point NN , , there EX ll RB obviously RB be VB some DT review NN of IN military JJ commitments NNS that IN different JJ countries NNS have VHP made VVN . SENT But CC let VV s PP just RB wait VV and CC see VV . SENT REPORTER NN . SENT inaudible JJ question NN DOWNER NN . SENT Yes UH , , we PP ve VVZ spoken VVN to TO the DT Chinese JJ on IN a DT number NN of IN occasions NNS about IN this DT issue NN and CC I NN ve NNS spoken VVN to TO the DT Chinese JJ myself PP over IN the DT last JJ few JJ years NNS about IN it PP . SENT And CC just RB before IN our PP$ latest JJS announcement NN on IN missile NN defence NN , , we PP spoke VVD to TO the DT Chinese JJ about IN it PP . SENT Look NN , , their PP$ reaction NN is VBZ that IN they PP have VHP a DT position NN where WRB they PP have VHP some DT nervousness NN about IN missile NN defence NN because IN of IN the DT Taiwan NP issue NN . SENT But CC we PP explained VVD to TO the DT Chinese JJ that IN , , first JJ of IN all DT , , our PP$ role NN in IN it PP would MD be VB much RB more RBR a DT research NN and CC development NN and CC scientific JJ role NN , , perhaps RB in IN the DT exchange NN of IN data NNS , , that DT sort NN of IN thing NN . SENT And CC we PP re NN not RB building VVG the DT missile NN defence NN systems NNS here RB in IN Australia NP or CC transferring VVG them PP to TO Taiwan NP . SENT And CC secondly RB , , this DT is VBZ only RB a DT system NN that WDT is VBZ aimed VVN at IN dealing VVG with IN missiles NNS from IN rogue NN states NNS or CC rogue NN organisations NNS . SENT They PP haven NN t NN made VVD a DT big JJ issue NN of IN it PP . SENT They PP haven NN t NN come VVN back RB to TO us PP and CC made VVD representations NNS since IN then RB . SENT REPORTER NN . SENT Do VVP you PP think VVP that IN now RB that IN there RB indistinct JJ Saddam NP Hussein NP s PP been VBN called VVN the DT biggest JJS weapon NN of IN mass JJ destruction NN that IN indistinct JJ sort NN of IN search NN will MD continue VV or CC DOWNER NN . SENT Oh UH , , no UH , , I PP think VVP the DT search NN absolutely RB needs VVZ to TO continue VV . SENT I PP think VVP there EX s PP been VBN a DT lot NN of IN verballing VVG of IN the DT Kay NP Report NP , , which WDT is VBZ the DT Iraq NP Survey NP Group NP Interim JJ Report NP produced VVD a DT couple NN of IN months NNS ago RB . SENT What WP the DT Kay NP Report NP demonstrates VVZ is VBZ from IN discussions NNS with IN witnesses NNS and CC former JJ scientists NNS in IN Iraq NP , , that DT Iraq NP was VBD absolutely RB proceeding VVG with IN its PP$ weapons NNS of IN mass JJ destruction NN programs NNS . SENT What WP hasn NN t NN been VBN found VVN are VBP the DT actual JJ missiles NNS or CC the DT actual JJ shells NNS loaded VVN with IN chemical NN material NN or CC a DT large JJ number NN of IN biological JJ agents NNS , , though IN some DT biological JJ agents NNS have VHP been VBN found VVN . SENT Obviously RB , , Saddam NP Hussein NP himself PP knows VVZ a DT great JJ deal NN about IN the DT weapons NNS of IN mass JJ destruction NN program VV he PP s PP presided VVD over IN it PP and CC he PP s VVZ the DT one CD who WP s PP authorised VVD the DT use NN of IN chemical JJ weapons NNS in IN the DT past NN . SENT But CC there EX s PP another DT point NN to TO make VV about IN this DT . SENT I PP think VVP Iraqis NNS themselves PP will MD be VB much RB more RBR forthcoming JJ now RB in IN talking VVG to TO the DT coalition NN about IN this DT issue NN because IN they PP know VVP that IN Saddam NP Hussein NP is VBZ never RB coming VVG back RB . SENT I PP think VVP a DT lot NN of IN Iraqis NNS are VBP worried VVN that IN there RB d NN be VB a DT lot NN of IN political JJ pressure NN in IN western JJ countries NNS to TO get VV the DT Americans NPS to TO withdraw VV from IN Iraq NP and CC when WRB that DT happened VVN , , then RB Saddam NP Hussein NP could MD come VV back RB to TO power NN . SENT Now RB the DT Iraqis NNS know VVP that IN that WDT s PP not RB going VVG to TO happen VV . SENT REPORTER NN . SENT Just RB on IN a DT lighter JJR note NN , , can MD I PP just RB get VVP a DT response NN . SENT We PP ve RB seen VVN some DT spontaneous JJ celebrations NNS by IN Australians NNS , , sort NN of IN , , here RB in IN Sydney NP and CC indistinct JJ people NNS taking VVG to TO the DT streets NNS quite RB joyous JJ about IN this DT experience NN . SENT Does VVZ that DT sort NN of IN lighten VV the DT heart NN considering VVG the DT controversy NN surrounding VVG the DT war NN in IN the DT first JJ place NN . SENT DOWNER NN . SENT Well RB , , people NNS like IN John NP Howard NP and CC Robert NP Hill NP and CC I NP , , we PP have VHP to TO be VB prepared VVN to TO be VB big JJ enough RB to TO deal VV with IN controversy NN . SENT I PP mean VVP that IN s PP what WP we PP re IN paid VVN to TO do VV . SENT We PP re NN paid VVN to TO make VV good JJ decisions NNS and CC not RB paid VVN to TO make VV easy JJ decisions NNS . SENT We PP could MD have VH made VVN an DT easy JJ decision NN and CC if IN the DT world NN had VHD made VVN an DT easy JJ decision NN , , Saddam NP Hussein NP would MD still RB be VB in IN power NN today NN . SENT Sure RB , , that WDT might MD have VH been VBN politically RB easy JJ to TO do VV that IN but CC it PP wouldn NN t NN be VB a DT good JJ world NN if IN Saddam NP Hussein NP was VBD still RB there RB . SENT We PP stood VVD up RP for IN a DT lot NN of IN things NNS in IN the DT last JJ year NN . SENT One CD of IN the DT things NNS we PP stood VVD up RP for IN is VBZ human JJ rights NNS . SENT It PP wouldn NN t NN be VB a DT good JJ contribution NN to TO human JJ rights NNS to TO have VH turned VVN your PP$ back NN on IN the DT brutality NN of IN Saddam NP Hussein NP s PP regime NN and CC left VVD him PP in IN power NN given VVN a DT choice NN , , and CC we PP had VHD a DT choice NN haven NN t NN always RB had VHD a DT choice NN , , but CC this DT year NN we PP had VHD a DT choice NN . SENT And CC when WRB we PP had VHD a DT choice NN we PP took VVD the DT choice NN . SENT We PP took VVD the DT choice NN to TO contribute VV to TO the DT disposal NN of IN the DT regime NN of IN Saddam NP Hussein NP . SENT That DT is VBZ a DT wonderful JJ thing NN for IN the DT people NNS of IN Iraq NP and CC that DT is VBZ a DT great JJ commitment NN to TO a DT more RBR secure JJ world NN , , and CC it PP s VVZ a DT great JJ commitment NN to TO human JJ rights NNS . SENT And CC I PP think VVP we PP should MD be VB proud JJ of IN the DT role NN our PP$ defence NN force NN did VVD play NN and CC still RB plays VVZ in IN helping VVG rid JJ the DT world NN of IN that DT monstrous JJ dictator NN . SENT REPORTER NN . SENT But CC human JJ rights NNS weren NN t NN the DT reason NN that IN we PP went VVD to TO Iraq NP though RB , , were VBD they PP . SENT DOWNER NN . SENT Well RB , , we PP said VVD that IN the DT legal JJ basis NN for IN it PP , , the DT legal JJ basis NN for IN the DT war NN was VBD breach NN of IN Security NP Council NP Resolution NP 1441 CD . SENT That DT was VBD the DT legal JJ basis NN for IN it PP . SENT But CC I PP m NN sorry JJ to TO say VV to TO people NNS who WP were VBD opposed VVN to TO getting VVG rid JJ of IN Saddam NP Hussein NP s PP regime NN that IN if IN we PP had VHD taken VVN their PP$ advice NN , , and CC at IN one CD stage NN it PP was VBD very RB popular JJ advice NN , , then RB Saddam NP Hussein NP would MD still RB be VB there RB . SENT He PP d NN still RB be VB in IN power NN . SENT He PP d NN still RB be VB brutalising VVG his PP$ people NNS . SENT He PP d NN still RB be VB threatening VVG his PP$ neighbours NNS . SENT He PP is VBZ gone VVN . SENT He PP is VBZ behind IN bars NNS . SENT It PP s PP a DT great JJ thing NN . SENT REPORTER NN . SENT indistinct JJ area NN of IN human JJ rights NNS indistinct JJ . SENT DOWNER NN . SENT Well RB , , I PP think VVP in IN the DT case NN of IN PNG NP , , it PP s VVZ not RB that IN there EX are VBP so RB much JJ human JJ rights NNS problems NNS , , although IN there EX are VBP human JJ rights NNS problems NNS everywhere RB , , of IN course NN . SENT But CC it PP s VVZ not RB so RB much RB a DT human JJ rights NNS issue NN , , it PP s VVZ a DT practical JJ issue NN . SENT They PP need MD help VV with IN reinforcing VVG their PP$ law NN and CC order NN , , reinforcing VVG their PP$ police NNS . SENT They PP need VVP some DT assistance NN with IN improving VVG the DT efficiency NN of IN their PP$ bureaucracy NN and CC we PP are VBP able JJ to TO provide VV that DT assistance NN . SENT And CC I PP think VVP it PP s PP an DT important JJ thing NN that IN we PP do VVP as IN a DT country NN . SENT We PP make VVP every DT effort NN to TO create VV a DT better JJR world NN and CC I PP don VV t NN think VV we PP re IN doing VVG a DT bad JJ job NN . SENT ENDS VVZ Copyright NP Commonwealth NP of IN Australia NP Disclaimer NN Privacy NN R NN . SENT G NP . SENT Casey NP Building NP , , John NP McEwen NP Crescent NN , , Barton NP , , ACT NN , , 0221 CD Australia NP . SENT Tel NP . SENT 61 CD 2 CD 6261 CD 1111 CD Fax NN . SENT 61 CD 2 CD 6261 CD 3111 CD Australian JJ State NP and CC Territory NP Offices NNS . SENT New NP South NP Wales NP , , Northern NP Territory NP , , Queensland NP , , South NP Australia NP , , Tasmania NP , , Victoria NP , , Western NP Australia NP ABN NP 47 CD 065 CD 634 CD 525 CD